Teams

GTC SILVER

2024 USTA MIXED 18 & OVER - DEN · MIXED 9.0 - 18 & OVER

15 players · average NTRP 4.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-05-25vs GTC NAVYWon 10
W#3 DoublesBen Atlee / Emily Jensik vs Tonya Laden / Paul Barrow6-4, 6-2
2024-05-05vs JCC GOLDLost 01
L#1 DoublesChad Picard / Kim Ripka vs Jeff Crosley / Emily Cease4-6, 6-7
2024-04-21vs LPTC REDWon 10
W#2 DoublesEmily Jensik / Miles Doane vs Tomas Mendez / Megan Melucci4-6, 6-1, 1-0
2024-04-14Won 10
W#2 DoublesChad Picard / Kim Ripka vs Brian Cox / Michelle Miller6-2, 6-4
2024-04-07vs CP PURPLEWon 10
W#3 DoublesChad Picard / Kim Ripka vs Roman Khmelev / Erica Bramlet5-7, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MIXED 9.0 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.21 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.60
Katherine Nicolson
published
4.43
Jenny Wiens
published
4.34
Chad Picard
published 4.5
4.33
Aaron Weil
published 4.5
4.31
Juliana Okulski
published
4.27
Lize Guerin
published
Ben Atlee
published 4.5
4.21
Stephanie Zaitz
published
4.12
Kim Ripka
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.06
Matthew Wiens
published
3.89
Emily Jensik
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
3.76
Lissa Moon
published
Kent Guerin
published
Miles Doane
published
Peter Nicolson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lissa Moon + Chad Picard224 matchesnot enough data
Lissa Moon + Peter Nicolson123 matchesnot enough data
Kent Guerin + Lize Guerin123 matchesnot enough data
Katherine Nicolson + Peter Nicolson213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Katherine Nicolson
12W–11L career · no lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.60
Jenny Wiens
3W–5L career · no lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.43
4.5
Chad Picard
35W–18L career · no lines in 2024
1%87%13%
4.34
4.5
Aaron Weil
7W–8L career · type S · no lines in 2024
1%88%11%
4.33
Juliana Okulski
13W–5L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%9%
4.31
Lize Guerin
13W–10L career · no lines in 2024
<1%3%97%
4.27
4.5
Ben Atlee
20W–10L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Stephanie Zaitz
7W–5L career · no lines in 2024
6%92%2%
4.21
4.5
Kim Ripka
78W–90L career · 3 lines in 2024
19%81%<1%
4.12
Matthew Wiens
16W–19L career · no lines in 2024
32%68%<1%
4.06
4.5
Emily Jensik
44W–52L career · 2 lines in 2024
78%22%<1%
3.89
Lissa Moon
32W–26L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%4%
3.76
Kent Guerin
1W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Miles Doane
3W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Peter Nicolson
18W–13L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.