Teams

LPTC RED

2024 USTA MIXED 18 & OVER - DEN · MIXED 9.0 - 18 & OVER

12 players · average NTRP 4.33 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-05-19vs JCC GOLDLost 03
L#1 DoublesBobbie Lutz / Harry Jewett IV vs Emily Cease / Oliver McKinstry4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesMegan Melucci / Meng Lian vs Jenny Loeff / Hector Valentin2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesMichelle Reeb / Tomas Mendez vs Clare Morey / Rocky Nelson2-6, 0-6
2024-05-12vs BVP NAVYLost 03
L#1 DoublesAmber McGregor / Meng Lian vs Vu Tran / Tina Francis4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesPhilip Dixon-Patterson / Megan Melucci vs Christa Dobbs / Vinh-Luu Le1-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesScott D Schoeman / Nikole Schoeman vs Kelsey Berlin / Armando Escalante1-6, 1-6
2024-05-05vs CP PURPLELost 03
L#1 DoublesAmber McGregor / Meng Lian vs Erica Bramlet / Roman Khmelev3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesBobbie Lutz / Philip Dixon-Patterson vs Hailey Suyumov / Zac Bergquist2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesNikole Schoeman / Scott D Schoeman vs Ajyra JONES / Clint Jones1-6, 2-6
2024-04-28vs DTC BLUELost 03
L#1 DoublesKara Jewett / Harry Jewett IV vs Kimberly Allen / Chris Erickson2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesBobbie Lutz / Philip Dixon-Patterson vs Jennifer Mele / Jonathan Musser2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesAmber McGregor / Scott D Schoeman vs Michelle Miller / Brian Cox1-6, 2-6
2024-04-21vs GTC SILVERLost 03
L#1 DoublesMichelle Reeb / Meng Lian vs Kent Guerin / Jenny Wiens3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesTomas Mendez / Megan Melucci vs Emily Jensik / Miles Doane6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesDorothy Monroe / Philip Dixon-Patterson vs Chad Picard / Stephanie Zaitz2-6, 4-6
2024-04-14vs CP ORANGELost 12
W#1 DoublesMeng Lian / Amber McGregor vs Christopher Morley / Robyn Klee7-6, 7-6
L#2 DoublesTomas Mendez / Bobbie Lutz vs Tobie Timmermans / Megan Davis1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesPhilip Dixon-Patterson / Kara Jewett vs Benjamin Schlichting / Melissa Doidge1-6, 2-6
2024-04-07vs GTC NAVYLost 12
L#1 DoublesKara Jewett / Harry Jewett IV vs JD Ready / Rachel Heise4-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesMegan Melucci / Meng Lian vs Paul Barrow / Tonya Laden7-5, 7-6
L#3 DoublesScott D Schoeman / Nikole Schoeman vs W Hancock / Margaret Harwood1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · MIXED 9.0 - 18 & OVER
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1SS-H GOLD611839151
2CP PURPLE5213819176
3JCC GOLD25101124190
4LPTC RED0721938248

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.96 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.27
Meng Lian
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #1 Doubles 44% · published 4.5
Harry Jewett IV
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.25
Megan Melucci
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.17
Amber McGregor
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4.5
4.08
Philip Dixon-Patterson
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
3.98
Michelle Reeb
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
3.71
Kara Jewett
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.67
Bobbie Lutz
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.52
Dorothy Monroe
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
Nikole Schoeman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Scott D Schoeman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Tomas Mendez
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Amber McGregor + Meng Lian2647% games−1.1% vs expected
Philip Dixon-Patterson + Dorothy Monroe1443% games−3.0% vs expected
Kara Jewett + Harry Jewett IV2841% games−7.4% vs expected
Bobbie Lutz + Tomas Mendez0535% gamesnot enough data
Meng Lian + Dorothy Monroe224 matchesnot enough data
Bobbie Lutz + Philip Dixon-Patterson044 matchesnot enough data
Meng Lian + Megan Melucci123 matchesnot enough data
Tomas Mendez + Megan Melucci033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Meng Lian
102W–63L career · 9 lines in 2024
2%94%4%
4.27
4.5
Harry Jewett IV
2W–11L career · type M · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
4.5
Megan Melucci
106W–74L career · 4 lines in 2024
3%95%3%
4.25
4.5
Amber McGregor
52W–63L career · 7 lines in 2024
9%90%1%
4.17
4.5
Philip Dixon-Patterson
62W–81L career · 5 lines in 2024
28%72%<1%
4.08
4.5
Michelle Reeb
39W–28L career · 2 lines in 2024
55%45%<1%
3.98
4
Kara Jewett
57W–42L career · 3 lines in 2024
6%93%1%
3.71
4
Bobbie Lutz
109W–67L career · 4 lines in 2024
9%90%1%
3.67
4
Dorothy Monroe
59W–60L career · 1 line in 2024
45%55%<1%
3.52
Nikole Schoeman
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Scott D Schoeman
0W–4L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Tomas Mendez
23W–37L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.