Teams

Happy Helper 1

2023 Adult 40 & Over · 4.0 Women

5 players · average NTRP 3.62 / ALASKA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2023-05-12vs AK-TAC-StoneLost 12
W#1 DoublesDonna Newman / Kima Kimura vs Triin Minton / Marlys Morton6-3
L#1 SinglesKaren Loeffler vs Catherine Stone1-6
L#2 DoublesDaniella DeLozier / Jessie Lief vs Trena Rairdon / Sarah Gillstrom1-6
2023-05-12vs AK-TAC-StoneLost 03
L#1 DoublesJessie Lief / Daniella DeLozier vs Allison Erickson / Sarah Gillstrom1-6
L#1 SinglesKima Kimura vs Trena Rairdon1-6
L#2 DoublesDonna Newman / Karen Loeffler vs Catherine Stone / Alice Knapp1-6
2023-05-12Won 20
W#1 SinglesKaren Loeffler vs N/A6-0
W#2 DoublesDonna Newman / Kima Kimura vs N/A6-0
2023-05-12Won 20
W#1 SinglesKima Kimura vs N/A6-0
W#2 DoublesJessie Lief / Daniella DeLozier vs N/A6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 4.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1AK-TAC-Stone40102226
2Happy Helper 10215533
3Happy Helper 20215533

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.33 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Daniella DeLozier
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.58
Kima Kimura
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.23
Karen Loeffler
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.19
Jessie Lief
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Donna Newman
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 0
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Daniella DeLozier + Jessie Lief12660% games+4.9% vs expected
Donna Newman + Daniella DeLozier404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Daniella DeLozier
57W–34L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Kima Kimura
33W–36L career · type A · 4 lines in 2023
<1%28%72%
3.58
3.5
Karen Loeffler
68W–83L career · type A · 3 lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
Jessie Lief
77W–91L career · 3 lines in 2023
9%90%1%
3.19
0
Donna Newman
75W–26L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.