Teams

DCC/Heinrich W4.5

2025 DALLAS TENNIS 18 & Over ADULT S · S W. Thursday League

20 players · average NTRP 4.44 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-06-25Won 20
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Jeffett / Chrissy Snelling vs Brooke Cabianca / Amy Gale7-5, 1-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Hunt / Terry McCullough vs Aubrey Findley / Tara Morgan6-2, 6-3
2025-06-19vs Samuell Grand/Jeffery-Musick W4.5Lost 13
W#1 DoublesAllison Parks / Julie Seale vs Lauren Dewhirst / Nicole Motley6-4, 6-1
L#2 DoublesChrissy Snelling / Elizabeth Jeffett vs Michelle Marketos / Carolyn Schultz5-7, 2-6
L#2 SinglesAnna Moss vs Rachel Pungwe3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesDanielle Daugbjerg / Katherine Lewis vs Courtney Case / Pamela Kvale2-6, 2-6
2025-06-05vs Garland/Smith W4.5Split 22
L#1 DoublesChrissy Snelling / Katherine Lewis vs Victoria Turck / Alexandra Turck3-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesElizabeth Hunt vs Kayleigh Holt6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesTerry McCullough / Ashley Begert vs Katie Winston / Lane Pender4-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesAllison Parks / Anna Moss vs Ryoko Suzuki / Rebecca Gunn6-1, 6-4
2025-05-22vs Gleneagles/Timothy W4.5Won 30
W#1 DoublesAllison Parks / Chrissy Snelling vs Mariana Devereaux / Codi Triesch6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesDanielle Daugbjerg / Shelby Flaten vs Renee Davidson / Meghan Lambert6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKatherine Lewis / Anna Moss vs Judy Barbo / April Murphy6-1, 6-0
2025-05-15Lost 12
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Hunt / Allison Parks vs Sonia Moorthy / Luisa Osorio6-2, 6-0
L#2 SinglesBlythe Koch vs Anne Perez4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesKatherine Lewis / Chrissy Snelling vs Kristin Eggleston / Caitlin Rhodes3-6, 3-6
2025-05-08vs DAC/N. Prinz-Wheeler W4.5Won 20
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Hunt / Allison Parks vs HIROE BLACKLEDGE / Laura Crain6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesAshley Begert / Shelby Flaten vs Stevie McCartney / Danielle Heston6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for S W. Thursday League have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.94 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.38
Allison Parks
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published 5
4.28
Blythe Koch
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 4.5
Anna Moss
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 4.5
Ashley Begert
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
Chrissy Snelling
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
Danielle Daugbjerg
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.25
Terry McCullough
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.10
Carolyn Heinrich
usually #1 Singles 57%, also #2 Singles 43% · published 4.5
4.02
Sarah Sparling
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Cynthia Beecherl
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4
3.61
Brandi Chilian
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
2.93
Sarah Hamlin
published
Elizabeth Hunt
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
Elizabeth Jeffett
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Jacky Pincoffs
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Julie Lilly
published
Julie Seale
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Kate LaGere
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Kim Wyly
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Shelby Flaten
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Shelby Flaten + Blythe Koch314 matchesnot enough data
Terry McCullough + Carolyn Heinrich224 matchesnot enough data
Kate LaGere + Jacky Pincoffs213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Allison Parks
19W–3L career · 8 lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.38
4.5
Blythe Koch
4W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
2%92%6%
4.28
4.5
Anna Moss
3W–2L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
4.5
Ashley Begert
2W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
4.5
Chrissy Snelling
2W–3L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
4.5
Danielle Daugbjerg
1W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Terry McCullough
10W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
4%93%4%
4.25
4.5
Carolyn Heinrich
18W–9L career · 7 lines in 2025
24%75%<1%
4.10
Sarah Sparling
17W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%44%56%
4.02
4
Cynthia Beecherl
2W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Brandi Chilian
4W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
3.61
Sarah Hamlin
2W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
2.93
Elizabeth Hunt
4W–0L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Elizabeth Jeffett
2W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jacky Pincoffs
3W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Julie Lilly
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Julie Seale
4W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Kate LaGere
2W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kim Wyly
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Shelby Flaten
6W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.