Teams

UPTA40C/Fischer/Pavilion

2025 UPTA Combo 40 & Over - SC · 40+ Combo Women - 7.5

16 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-09-11vs UPTA40C/OShea/GCCWon 21
W#1 DoublesKirby King / Katie Saad vs Amanda Jones / Amy Greer7-6, 6-0
W#2 DoublesAlexandra Mendoza / Vera McCray vs Nori Morgan / Carrie Ann Twedt6-2, 6-0
L#3 DoublesAndrea Scoggins / Sandra Hagler vs Tracy O'Shea / Jamie Womack6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2025-09-04vs UPTA40C/McNeel/Butler SpringsLost 12
L#1 DoublesKirby King / Naomi Kozawa vs Tamarah Hagen / Laura McNeel3-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesSandra Hagler / Julie Branham vs Greta Harper / Natilee Falk7-6, 6-3
L#3 DoublesCarlynn Eisner / Melissa Coles vs Heather Clark / Austin Clay2-6, 5-7
2025-08-28vs UPTA40C/Clay/ThornbladeLost 03
L#1 DoublesCarlynn Eisner / Alexandra Mendoza vs Amy Jacoby / Jill Thompson4-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesJane Koubek / Charity Richards vs Kathleen Hull / Brantley Goforth3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesKatie Saad / Stephanie Trotter Walker vs Kelly Clay / Jill Seeley1-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-08-26vs UPTA40C/Beeby/KrocWon 21
L#1 DoublesVera McCray / Naomi Kozawa vs Holly Smith / Kim McFall6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMelissa Coles / Jane Koubek vs Erin Brasington / Sarah Hendricks7-6, 6-1
W#3 DoublesJennifer Tuttle / Rebecca Haas vs Rebecca Beeby / Lisa Maurides7-5, 6-2
2025-08-21vs UPTA40C/Blinston/Hwy14Split 11
W#1 DoublesKirby King / Jennifer Tuttle vs Sandy Weston / Maria Gulli6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesRebecca Haas / Andrea Scoggins vs Tressa Jordan / Danielle Henderson1-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40+ Combo Women - 7.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.25 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.52
Vera McCray
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.52
Kirby King
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.48
Jane Koubek
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.32
Jennifer Tuttle
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.30
Stephanie Trotter Walker
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.28
Rebecca Haas
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.25
Sandra Hagler
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.23
Yuriko Centa
published
3.22
Melissa Coles
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.21
Charity Richards
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.20
Julie Branham
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.14
Andrea Scoggins
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.05
Carlynn Eisner
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.02
Katie Saad
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.01
Naomi Kozawa
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Rhonda Fischer
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Vera McCray + Kirby King10465% games+8.9% vs expected
Jane Koubek + Rebecca Haas3250% gamesnot enough data
Julie Branham + Sandra Hagler5061% gamesnot enough data
Melissa Coles + Jane Koubek224 matchesnot enough data
Jane Koubek + Sandra Hagler224 matchesnot enough data
Jennifer Tuttle + Rebecca Haas314 matchesnot enough data
Julie Branham + Rebecca Haas224 matchesnot enough data
Rebecca Haas + Sandra Hagler134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Vera McCray
40W–26L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.52
Kirby King
40W–18L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.52
Jane Koubek
20W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.48
Jennifer Tuttle
32W–21L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.32
Stephanie Trotter Walker
34W–29L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%2%98%
3.30
Rebecca Haas
41W–69L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%2%98%
3.28
Sandra Hagler
50W–31L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%4%96%
3.25
Yuriko Centa
7W–12L career · no lines in 2025
97%3%<1%
3.23
Melissa Coles
25W–18L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%6%94%
3.22
3.5
Charity Richards
2W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
6%92%2%
3.21
Julie Branham
49W–34L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%8%92%
3.20
3.5
Andrea Scoggins
17W–39L career · 5 lines in 2025
15%84%1%
3.14
3.5
Carlynn Eisner
4W–16L career · 2 lines in 2025
35%65%<1%
3.05
Katie Saad
22W–19L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%43%57%
3.02
Naomi Kozawa
38W–30L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%<1%>99%
3.01
Rhonda Fischer
0W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.