Teams

Sassy Sistas

2025 USTA ADULT 55 and OVER - BOISE · TV

9 players · average NTRP 4.00 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-07-09vs Fast & FlurriousLost 01
L#2 DoublesJo Ann Kurz / Sandra Cashen vs Hanna Bigelow / Carmen Little6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2025-07-02vs Idaho/Wood/55&Over9.0WLost 01
L#1 DoublesJo Ann Kurz / Patricia Bergstrand vs Tracy Carpenter / Rachel Kincheloe3-6, 2-6
2025-06-23vs Idaho/Wood/55&Over9.0WLost 01
L#3 DoublesJo Ann Kurz / Kristen Jacobs vs Mila Wood / Jody Mallane4-6, 2-6
2025-06-18vs Fast & FlurriousLost 01
L#1 DoublesJo Ann Kurz / Jane Doe vs Debbie Wachtell / Carmen Little4-6, 3-6
2025-06-11vs Idaho/Wood/55&Over9.0WLost 01
L#2 DoublesVicki McBride / Jo Ann Kurz vs Kathy Brashear / Jody Mallane4-6, 3-6
2025-06-09vs Fast & FlurriousLost 01
L#2 DoublesPatricia Bergstrand / Jo Ann Kurz vs Andrea Gillis / Carmen Little4-6, 4-6
2025-06-02vs Idaho/Wood/55&Over9.0WWon 10
W#2 DoublesJo Ann Kurz / Vicki McBride vs Ashley Davis / Mila Wood1-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · TV
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Idaho/Wood/55&Over9.0W7119513162
2Fast & Flurrious35121230239
3Sassy Sistas2651940261

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.83 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.96
Kristen Jacobs
published 4
3.96
Vicki McBride
published
3.92
3.87
Sandra Cashen
published 4
3.86
Kathy Scribner
published 4
3.84
Beth Calvo
published 4
3.80
Lisa Diehr
published 4
3.43
Terry Hardy
published 4
Jo Ann Kurz
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kristen Jacobs + Kathy Scribner7260% games+4.1% vs expected
Kristen Jacobs + Beth Calvo11555% games+3.9% vs expected
Terry Hardy + Beth Calvo151352% games−3.5% vs expected
Terry Hardy + Lisa Diehr61142% games−7.8% vs expected
Jo Ann Kurz + Vicki McBride4251% gamesnot enough data
Kristen Jacobs + Lisa Diehr2344% gamesnot enough data
Jo Ann Kurz + Patricia Bergstrand044 matchesnot enough data
Patricia Bergstrand + Beth Calvo134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Kristen Jacobs
208W–89L career · no lines in 2025
<1%60%40%
3.96
Vicki McBride
154W–127L career · no lines in 2025
<1%62%38%
3.96
4
Patricia Bergstrand
77W–56L career · no lines in 2025
<1%72%28%
3.92
4
Sandra Cashen
12W–32L career · no lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
3.87
4
Kathy Scribner
87W–43L career · no lines in 2025
<1%83%16%
3.86
4
Beth Calvo
168W–125L career · no lines in 2025
1%87%13%
3.84
4
Lisa Diehr
92W–87L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.80
4
Terry Hardy
157W–231L career · no lines in 2025
68%32%<1%
3.43
Jo Ann Kurz
21W–17L career · 7 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.