Teams

Fast & Flurrious

2025 USTA ADULT 55 and OVER - BOISE · TV

9 players · average NTRP 4.31 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-07-09vs Sassy SistasWon 10
W#2 DoublesHanna Bigelow / Carmen Little vs Jo Ann Kurz / Sandra Cashen4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-07-07vs Idaho/Wood/55&Over9.0WLost 01
L#3 DoublesLaura Larsen / Hanna Bigelow vs Maryann Moorhead / Bobette Wood2-6, 2-6
2025-06-09Won 10
W#3 DoublesHanna Bigelow / Laura Larsen vs Beth Calvo / Lisa Diehr6-2, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · TV
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Idaho/Wood/55&Over9.0W7119513162
2Fast & Flurrious35121230239
3Sassy Sistas2651940261

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.90 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.32
Andrea Gillis
published 4.5
4.22
Shelley Ware
published 4.5
4.10
Debbie Wachtell
published 4.5
4.00
Debbie Merritt
published 4
3.95
Carmen Little
published 4.5
3.95
Dana Rosellini
published 4.5
3.62
Laura Larsen
published 4
3.04
Hanna Bigelow
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dana Rosellini + Shelley Ware3745% games−0.8% vs expected
Carmen Little + Debbie Wachtell171355% games−8.4% vs expected
Carmen Little + Shelley Ware6457% gamesnot enough data
Carmen Little + Hanna Bigelow2436% gamesnot enough data
Debbie Wachtell + Shelley Ware3349% gamesnot enough data
Debbie Merritt + Shelley Ware134 matchesnot enough data
Hanna Bigelow + Laura Larsen224 matchesnot enough data
Carmen Little + Dana Rosellini123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Andrea Gillis
98W–57L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%10%
4.32
4.5
Shelley Ware
144W–92L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
4.22
4.5
Debbie Wachtell
94W–54L career · no lines in 2025
23%76%<1%
4.10
4
Debbie Merritt
205W–117L career · no lines in 2025
<1%50%50%
4.00
4.5
Carmen Little
70W–64L career · no lines in 2025
63%37%<1%
3.95
4.5
Dana Rosellini
134W–115L career · no lines in 2025
64%36%<1%
3.95
4
Laura Larsen
17W–10L career · no lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
3.62
4
Jennifer Mitchell
164W–142L career · no lines in 2025
>99%<1%<1%
3.04
Hanna Bigelow
7W–15L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.