Teams

Reedy, Mark

2022 Adult 18 & Over Summer 2.5W - 5.0 · 4.0 Men

11 players · average NTRP 4.17 / HEART OF AMERICA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2022-05-07vs HOAWC/Thyagarajan/18&Over4.0MWon 21
W#1 DoublesJeff Kirkpatrick / William Zung vs Guillermo Ospino / Andrew Mirakian6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesKurt Davids / Russell Packard vs Eric Goforth / Joe Lucas6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesMark Reedy / Eric Jay vs Ram Shankar / Vageesh Kumar3-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.85 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.17
Eric Jay
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.87
William Zung
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.80
Russell Packard
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.79
Bob Warkentine
published 4
Blake Baraban
published 4
3.64
Kurt Davids
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Benjamin Nathan
published
Casey Lee
published
Jeff Kirkpatrick
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Mark Reedy
published
Robert Jacobs
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kurt Davids + William Zung5066% games+8.0% vs expected
Russell Packard + William Zung8357% games+5.4% vs expected
Eric Jay + William Zung16660% games+5.1% vs expected
Eric Jay + Blake Baraban7357% games+4.5% vs expected
Kurt Davids + Russell Packard4357% games+1.7% vs expected
Mark Reedy + Jeff Kirkpatrick3645% games−2.4% vs expected
Russell Packard + Mark Reedy2348% games−2.9% vs expected
Blake Baraban + William Zung3254% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Eric Jay
54W–29L career · 1 line in 2022
9%90%1%
4.17
William Zung
72W–34L career · 1 line in 2022
<1%83%16%
3.87
Russell Packard
44W–44L career · 1 line in 2022
1%93%6%
3.80
4
Bob Warkentine
63W–51L career · no lines in 2022
1%94%5%
3.79
4
Blake Baraban
21W–18L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Kurt Davids
65W–34L career · 1 line in 2022
15%85%<1%
3.64
Benjamin Nathan
1W–7L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Casey Lee
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Jeff Kirkpatrick
8W–22L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Mark Reedy
6W–21L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Robert Jacobs
6W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.