Teams

KNO RED

2022 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER

10 players · average NTRP 3.30 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-07-21vs PRC BLUELost 13
L#1 DoublesKim Haverly / Kelly Lownsberry vs Lisa Franklin / Sheila Curry3-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesHeather Fox vs Dana van Daele3-6
L#2 DoublesBeth Cooper / Theresa Hendrix vs Lori McDevitt / Stephanie Stavri3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJane Webster / Kelly Hayes vs Patti Cottrell / Cheri Walker6-4, 6-1
2022-07-14vs HW REDLost 04
L#1 DoublesKim Haverly / Patti Akright vs Polly Cantor / Jennifer Marlowe6-4, 0-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesHeather Fox vs Jennifer Johnson3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesTheresa Hendrix / Lucy Floyd vs Leslie Cutter / Corby McGrath7-5, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJane Webster / Lynsey Orr vs Randy Eidler / Kathe Gouin3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2022-07-13vs WC REDWon 31
L#1 DoublesPatti Akright / Lucy Floyd vs Kyle Davis / Kristin Linhardt6-7, 3-6
W#1 SinglesKim Haverly vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesJane Webster / Lynsey Orr vs MaryBeth Doerr / Mary Ann Martin6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesTheresa Hendrix / Beth Cooper vs Melody Sattizahn / Virginia Gamble6-4, 5-7, 1-0
2022-07-03vs LTFC YELLOWLost 04
L#1 DoublesKim Haverly / Kelly Lownsberry vs Michelle Lockwood / Laura Fry2-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesLucy Floyd vs Paula Hruska3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesTheresa Hendrix / Beth Cooper vs Jill Myers / Sheila Laurienti4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesKelly Hayes / Jane Webster vs Sandy Biley / Carol Lail0-6, 6-7
2022-06-23vs HFII GREENWon 31
W#1 DoublesKelly Lownsberry / Lucy Floyd vs Melissa Owens / Lisa Watson6-4, 6-2
L#1 SinglesHeather Fox vs Jeana Marks4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesKelly Hayes / Jane Webster vs Crystal Stowe / Mary Thompson7-6, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesBeth Cooper / Lynsey Orr vs Elizabeth Gotto / Michelle Johnson6-3, 6-2
2022-06-16vs HRCA BLUEWon 31
W#1 DoublesKim Haverly / Patti Akright vs Adele Rhinehart / Melinda Shaffer6-2, 6-4
L#1 SinglesLucy Floyd vs Deborah Miller4-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesJane Webster / Lynsey Orr vs Shannon Porter / Cinda Nab6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesTheresa Hendrix / Beth Cooper vs Julie Johns / Jennifer McPherson6-1, 6-3
2022-06-09vs HV PINKWon 40
W#1 DoublesKelly Lownsberry / Kim Haverly vs Sue Smith / Courtney Claussen6-4, 7-6
W#1 SinglesLynsey Orr vs Piper Vitale0-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJane Webster / Kelly Hayes vs Theresa Mehringer / Polly Dickson4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLucy Floyd / Patti Akright vs Jeanne Cole / Rhonda Williamson6-3, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.99 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.24
Kelly Lownsberry
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.24
Kim Haverly
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #1 Singles 17% · published 3.5
3.05
Kelly Hayes
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.91
Beth Cooper
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
2.88
Lucy Floyd
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.65
Jane Webster
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published 3
Heather Fox
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Lynsey Orr
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Patti Akright
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Theresa Hendrix
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lynsey Orr + Jane Webster5255% games+8.3% vs expected
Kelly Lownsberry + Jane Webster1538% games+3.8% vs expected
Lucy Floyd + Kelly Lownsberry3248% games+2.5% vs expected
Kelly Hayes + Jane Webster7351% games+0.8% vs expected
Kim Haverly + Lucy Floyd6847% games−0.4% vs expected
Beth Cooper + Lucy Floyd4745% games−2.0% vs expected
Kim Haverly + Kelly Lownsberry41245% games−3.0% vs expected
Beth Cooper + Kelly Lownsberry4449% games−3.9% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Kelly Lownsberry
108W–79L career · 4 lines in 2022
3%94%2%
3.24
3.5
Kim Haverly
75W–76L career · 6 lines in 2022
3%94%2%
3.24
Kelly Hayes
11W–22L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%34%66%
3.05
3.5
Beth Cooper
37W–76L career · type A · 5 lines in 2022
76%24%<1%
2.91
3
Lucy Floyd
49W–78L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%83%17%
2.88
3
Jane Webster
68W–125L career · 7 lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
2.65
Heather Fox
1W–5L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Lynsey Orr
15W–13L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Patti Akright
10W–16L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Theresa Hendrix
14W–32L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.