Teams

LTFC YELLOW

2022 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-07-21vs HW REDSplit 22
L#1 DoublesSeema Shah / Sandy Biley vs Leslie Cutter / Corby McGrath4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#1 SinglesPaula Hruska vs Jennifer Johnson4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCarmen Harrington / Halle Holmes vs Randy Eidler / Kathe Gouin1-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesSheila Laurienti / Michelle Lockwood vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-07-17vs HFII GREENWon 40
W#1 DoublesSandy Biley / Seema Shah vs Jeana Marks / Lisa Watson7-5, 6-4
W#1 SinglesPaula Hruska vs Gretchen Garrison6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMichelle Lockwood / Sheila Laurienti vs Ann Hugh / Mary Thompson1-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCarol Lail / Jill Myers vs Elizabeth Gotto / Michelle Johnson6-3, 6-4
2022-07-14vs WC REDWon 21
W#1 DoublesMichelle Lockwood / Sheila Laurienti vs Kyle Davis / Kristin Linhardt6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSeema Shah / Sandy Biley vs Katie Kline / Virginia Gamble6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesHalle Holmes / Carol Lail vs Joanne Waring / Melody Sattizahn4-6, 1-6
2022-07-03vs KNO REDWon 40
W#1 DoublesMichelle Lockwood / Laura Fry vs Kim Haverly / Kelly Lownsberry6-2, 6-4
W#1 SinglesPaula Hruska vs Lucy Floyd6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJill Myers / Sheila Laurienti vs Theresa Hendrix / Beth Cooper6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesSandy Biley / Carol Lail vs Kelly Hayes / Jane Webster6-0, 7-6
2022-06-23vs HRCA BLUEWon 40
W#1 DoublesMichelle Lockwood / Jill Myers vs Deborah Miller / Colleen Krebsbach7-6, 6-3
W#1 SinglesSandy Biley vs Amy Tharp3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSheila Laurienti / Carmen Harrington vs Shannon Porter / Julie Johns6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesHalle Holmes / Carol Lail vs Dana Anderson / Cinda Nab7-6, 6-2
2022-06-16vs HV PINKLost 12
W#1 DoublesJill Myers / Laura Fry vs Piper Vitale / Courtney Claussen6-1, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCarmen Harrington / Michelle Lockwood vs Jeanne Cole / Ann Mann2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesHalle Holmes / Sandy Biley vs Polly Dickson / Sue Smith6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2022-06-09vs PRC BLUELost 04
L#1 DoublesCarol Lail / Halle Holmes vs Lisa Franklin / Sheila Curry0-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesSandy Biley vs Jaime West6-4, 5-7, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJill Myers / Michelle Lockwood vs Lori McDevitt / Billie Aguilar5-7, 6-7
L#3 DoublesLaura Fry / Sheila Laurienti vs Stephanie Stavri / Carol Brohl1-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.22 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.54
Sandy Biley
usually #1 Singles 29%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.52
Jill Myers
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.24
Laura Fry
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.17
Michelle Lockwood
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
3.14
Carmen Harrington
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.06
Carol Lail
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.06
Halle Holmes
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
3.04
Heather McGinnis
published 3.5
Paula Hruska
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Seema Shah
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Sheila Laurienti
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jill Myers + Michelle Lockwood8158% games+9.2% vs expected
Laura Fry + Michelle Lockwood6358% games+3.8% vs expected
Laura Fry + Sandy Biley5252% games+1.7% vs expected
Michelle Lockwood + Carmen Harrington81149% games−1.1% vs expected
Jill Myers + Sandy Biley61044% games−1.5% vs expected
Laura Fry + Halle Holmes6451% games−1.7% vs expected
Halle Holmes + Carmen Harrington6849% games−1.7% vs expected
Carol Lail + Halle Holmes2346% games−5.2% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Sandy Biley
120W–109L career · 7 lines in 2022
37%63%<1%
3.54
Jill Myers
66W–59L career · 5 lines in 2022
42%58%<1%
3.52
Laura Fry
60W–52L career · 3 lines in 2022
3%94%2%
3.24
3.5
Michelle Lockwood
68W–53L career · 7 lines in 2022
10%89%<1%
3.17
3.5
Carmen Harrington
57W–54L career · 3 lines in 2022
14%86%<1%
3.14
3.5
Carol Lail
88W–99L career · 5 lines in 2022
31%69%<1%
3.06
3
Halle Holmes
56W–46L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%32%68%
3.06
3.5
Heather McGinnis
80W–85L career · no lines in 2022
37%63%<1%
3.04
Paula Hruska
20W–24L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Seema Shah
6W–14L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Sheila Laurienti
15W–19L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.