Teams

Jo.Diamond55C

2024 Capital Combo 55 & Over · 7.5 Men

13 players · average NTRP 3.72 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2024-10-15vs To.Muncie55CWon 21
L#1 DoublesDavid Ferris / James Klemenz vs David McNeill / Robert Caulfield3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesVincent Conzola / Ken Nowell vs Larry Essary / Bill Green6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJohn Diamond / Scott Zargo vs Mark Zimmerman / John Cleary6-3, 6-2
2024-10-08vs Jo.Parham55CWon 30
W#1 DoublesDavid Ferris / W Troutman vs John Parham / Jason Sage6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJames Klemenz / Mark Baldwin vs Joe Murphy / Jeffery Troch6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesKen Glanville / Ken Nowell vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-10-07vs Al.McMillen55CWon 10
W#2 DoublesVincent Conzola / Ken Nowell vs Peter Williams / Keith Parks6-0, 6-3
2024-09-30vs Ro.Kent55CWon 20
W#1 DoublesW Troutman / Ken Glanville vs Mitch Strobin / Alan Crews6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesVincent Conzola / Ken Nowell vs Jack Pyritz / Kevin Tombs7-5, 6-3
2024-09-24vs Ch.Brignac55CWon 20
W#2 DoublesW Troutman / David Swann vs Charles Brignac / Rick Pfeiffer6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJohn Diamond / Scott Zargo vs Gary Sollenberger / Greg Kasse6-2, 6-4
2024-09-10vs To.Muncie55CWon 30
W#1 DoublesJames Klemenz / Mark Baldwin vs Larry Essary / John Cleary6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesKen Nowell / David Swann vs Mark Zimmerman / Robert Caulfield6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesScott Zargo / Ken Lawton vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-09-03vs Jo.Parham55CWon 30
W#1 DoublesW Troutman / David Swann vs John van Campen / Gordon Bailey6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesScott Riley / Vincent Conzola vs Scott Patton / Sean Ahr6-0, 6-3
W#3 DoublesKen Lawton / Scott Zargo vs Joe Murphy / McNair Bell6-4, 7-5
2024-08-27vs Al.McMillen55CWon 21
W#1 DoublesJames Klemenz / Mark Baldwin vs Bill Francis / Keven Griffith6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesKen Lawton / Ken Glanville vs Charles George / John Perry3-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesW Troutman / Charles Newsome vs Reginald B Gillespie Jr / Larry Gregory Williams7-5, 6-0
2024-08-20vs Ch.Brignac55CWon 30
W#1 DoublesJames Klemenz / Mark Baldwin vs Ray Goldberg / Charles Brignac6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesVincent Conzola / Ken Nowell vs John VanDeWater / David Zatz6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJohn Diamond / Scott Zargo vs Rick Pfeiffer / Mike Cockrill3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2024-08-13vs Ro.Kent55CSplit 11
W#1 DoublesMark Baldwin / Ken Nowell vs Alan Crews / Kevin Tombs6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesKen Lawton / David Swann vs Jack Pyritz / Roger Hatlen0-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.61 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.98
W Troutman
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.89
John Diamond
published
3.82
Ken Lawton
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.81
James Klemenz
usually #3 Doubles 44%, also #1 Doubles 44% · published 4
3.78
Mark Baldwin
published
3.76
Ken Nowell
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.69
Scott Riley
published
3.53
David Swann
published 3.5
3.48
David Ferris
published 3.5
3.42
Ken Glanville
published
3.38
Vincent Conzola
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.27
Scott Zargo
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.08
Charles Newsome
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

John Diamond + Ken Nowell6166% games+3.0% vs expected
Vincent Conzola + Ken Nowell18759% games+1.3% vs expected
Ken Lawton + Ken Nowell10753% games−8.7% vs expected
Scott Zargo + Ken Lawton8260% gamesnot enough data
W Troutman + Ken Nowell6162% gamesnot enough data
Mark Baldwin + Ken Nowell4159% gamesnot enough data
James Klemenz + Ken Nowell224 matchesnot enough data
John Diamond + Scott Riley404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
W Troutman
355W–115L career · 10 lines in 2024
<1%56%44%
3.98
John Diamond
13W–4L career · no lines in 2024
<1%78%22%
3.89
4
Ken Lawton
95W–65L career · 4 lines in 2024
1%89%10%
3.82
4
James Klemenz
188W–132L career · 9 lines in 2024
1%90%9%
3.81
Mark Baldwin
18W–5L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.78
4
Ken Nowell
211W–146L career · 7 lines in 2024
3%93%4%
3.76
Scott Riley
17W–12L career · no lines in 2024
8%90%1%
3.69
3.5
David Swann
14W–12L career · no lines in 2024
<1%40%60%
3.53
3.5
David Ferris
16W–9L career · no lines in 2024
<1%55%45%
3.48
Ken Glanville
18W–23L career · no lines in 2024
<1%72%28%
3.42
3.5
Vincent Conzola
205W–133L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%79%20%
3.38
3.5
Scott Zargo
60W–71L career · 5 lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Charles Newsome
4W–4L career · no lines in 2024
29%71%<1%
3.08

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.