Teams

NPT:Lewis:Deacon

2022 NH Adult 18 & Over Women Weekend · Diva 3.0

2 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NEW HAMPSHIRE

View scouting list →
Schedule11 played
2022-01-21vs YMCA:Gagnon:SkiltonLost 01
L#1 DoublesJulie Deacon / C Lewis vs Catherine Gagnon / Pamela Skilton8-9
2022-01-21vs EXE:Bosli:TallLost 01
L#1 DoublesJulie Deacon / C Lewis vs Lamia Bosli / Anne Tall6-8
2021-12-05vs YMCA:Koshy:WhiteLost 01
L#1 DoublesC Lewis / Betty Ann Giles vs Nicole Driscoll / Allison Ropes2-6, 2-6
2021-11-21vs EXE:Law:RichmondSplit 11
W#1 DoublesC Lewis / Betty Ann Giles vs Vivien Law / Kristin Morgenstern6-4, 6-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAshleigh McFarlin / Julie Deacon vs Lamia Bosli / Leslie Rifkin2-6, 2-6
2021-11-14vs CON:Walsh:BlatsosWon 10
W#1 DoublesC Lewis / Linda Arnold vs Suzanne Walsh / Debbie Blatsos6-1, 6-4
2021-11-07vs MITC:Morison:BrownWon 10
W#1 DoublesLinda Arnold / C Lewis vs Gloria Morison / Annette Taylor6-4, 6-3
2021-10-31vs YMCA:Willett:ChrissisLost 02
L#1 DoublesBetty Ann Giles / C Lewis vs Julie Chrissis / Lori Wiechers2-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesJulie Deacon / Sara Lang vs Cynthia Willett / Pamela Skilton3-6, 6-7
2021-10-24vs YMCA:Johnson:WhiteLost 02
L#1 DoublesC Lewis / Betty Ann Giles vs JOLENE JOHNSON / Nicole Driscoll3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesJulie Deacon / Julie Segien vs Shannon Gagnon / Jennifer Cannon6-7, 1-6
2021-10-03vs CON:Cremeno:CarrollWon 10
W#1 DoublesC Lewis / Betty Ann Giles vs Jane Cremeno / Debbie Blatsos6-1, 4-6, 1-0
2021-09-26vs MITC:Morison:BrownWon 10
W#1 DoublesLinda Arnold / C Lewis vs Gloria Morison / Gail Bleakley3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2021-09-19vs YMCA:Koshy:WhiteLost 01
L#1 DoublesC Lewis / Betty Ann Giles vs Nisha Koshy / Lori Wiechers5-7, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings17 teams · Diva 3.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1EXE:Bosli:Tall2020010
2YMCA:Koshy:White202004
3YMCA:Herz:Sufat2020013
4MITC:Morison:Brown202003
5YMCA:Murphy:Wiechers202008
6EXE:Law:Bruno1111115
7YMCA:Gagnon:Skilton1111116
8CON:Dahme:Kugel111118
9NPT:Arnold:Truax1111113
10YMCA:Hendry:Leibig1111115
11YMCA:Willett:Chrissis1111110
12NPT:Tivnan:Lang1111116
13NPT:Lewis:Deacon0202217
14MITC:Barker:Twitchell0202217
15HH:Ries:Kluger0202217
16CON:Walsh:Blatsos0202216
17YMCA:Krasnof::Tieder0202217

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.59 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.83
C Lewis
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.34
Julie Deacon
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

C Lewis + Julie Deacon033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
C Lewis
48W–57L career · 11 lines in 2022
1%89%10%
2.83
Julie Deacon
10W–33L career · 5 lines in 2022
89%11%<1%
2.34

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.