Teams

NPT:Arnold:Truax

2022 NH Adult 18 & Over Women Weekend · Diva 3.0

2 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NEW HAMPSHIRE

View scouting list →
Schedule11 played
2022-01-21vs CON:Dahme:KugelWon 10
W#1 DoublesLinda Arnold / Elizabeth Truax vs Patricia Dahme / Kelley Kugel8-4
2022-01-21vs YMCA:Hendry:LeibigLost 01
L#1 DoublesLinda Arnold / Elizabeth Truax vs Joreen Hendry / Linda Leibig7-9
2021-11-21vs EXE:Law:RichmondWon 10
W#2 DoublesLinda Arnold / Pat Tivnan vs Tracey Gamache / Kristine Quintal3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2021-11-14vs CON:Walsh:BlatsosWon 10
W#1 DoublesC Lewis / Linda Arnold vs Suzanne Walsh / Debbie Blatsos6-1, 6-4
2021-11-07vs MITC:Barker:TwitchellSplit 11
W#1 DoublesLinda Arnold / C Lewis vs Gloria Morison / Annette Taylor6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Truax / Michelle Gibbs vs Cher Barker / Libby Twitchell7-5, 2-6, 0-1
2021-10-31vs YMCA:Gagnon:SkiltonLost 01
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Truax / Michelle Gibbs vs Catherine Gagnon / Rebecca Krasnof4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2021-10-24vs YMCA:Herz:SufatWon 10
W#2 DoublesSara Lang / Elizabeth Truax vs Jeanne Herz / Stephanie Murphy6-2, 6-1
2021-10-17vs EXE:Law:RichmondLost 01
L#1 DoublesLinda Arnold / Elizabeth Truax vs Shannon Richmond / Christine Tatro5-7, 4-6
2021-10-03vs CON:Dahme:KugelWon 10
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Truax / Sara Lang vs Kelley Kugel / Patricia Dahme6-1, 6-3
2021-09-26vs MITC:Morison:BrownWon 10
W#1 DoublesLinda Arnold / C Lewis vs Gloria Morison / Gail Bleakley3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2021-09-19vs YMCA:Koshy:WiechersLost 01
L#2 DoublesLinda Arnold / Shelia Cardamone vs Lara Shilling / Cynthia Willett3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings17 teams · Diva 3.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1EXE:Bosli:Tall2020010
2YMCA:Koshy:White202004
3YMCA:Herz:Sufat2020013
4MITC:Morison:Brown202003
5YMCA:Murphy:Wiechers202008
6EXE:Law:Bruno1111115
7YMCA:Gagnon:Skilton1111116
8CON:Dahme:Kugel111118
9NPT:Arnold:Truax1111113
10YMCA:Hendry:Leibig1111115
11YMCA:Willett:Chrissis1111110
12NPT:Tivnan:Lang1111116
13NPT:Lewis:Deacon0202217
14MITC:Barker:Twitchell0202217
15HH:Ries:Kluger0202217
16CON:Walsh:Blatsos0202216
17YMCA:Krasnof::Tieder0202217

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.80 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.81
Elizabeth Truax
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 3
2.78
Linda Arnold
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Elizabeth Truax + Linda Arnold7453% games−7.6% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Elizabeth Truax
37W–49L career · 7 lines in 2022
1%92%7%
2.81
Linda Arnold
50W–40L career · 8 lines in 2022
2%94%5%
2.78

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.