Teams

Refunded/credit

Extras · Combo

13 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTHWESTERN OHIO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings1 teams · Combo
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Refunded/credit000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.16 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.19
Julie Britton
published
3.98
Braden Tucker
published 4
3.38
Susan Spragg
published
3.32
Wendy Poitinger
published 3.5
3.27
Sam Dutta
published
3.13
James Jacobs
published
3.01
Nicole LeBoutillier
published
2.98
Jonathan Burns
published
2.94
2.88
Angela Pitt
published 3
2.78
Timothy Brand
published
2.73
Rylee Mowery
published
2.41
Judy Campbell
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Julie Britton + Wendy Poitinger9276% games+13.4% vs expected
Timothy Brand + Jonathan Burns8655% games+8.5% vs expected
Nicole LeBoutillier + Wendy Poitinger5266% games+6.3% vs expected
James Jacobs + Timothy Brand2352% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Julie Britton
128W–72L career · no lines in 2025
8%90%1%
4.19
4
Braden Tucker
72W–26L career · no lines in 2025
<1%57%43%
3.98
Susan Spragg
92W–65L career · no lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.38
3.5
Wendy Poitinger
261W–148L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.32
Sam Dutta
64W–45L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
James Jacobs
129W–49L career · no lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
3.13
Nicole LeBoutillier
62W–41L career · no lines in 2025
47%53%<1%
3.01
Jonathan Burns
40W–31L career · no lines in 2025
54%46%<1%
2.98
Kathryn Clarke-Stumbo
20W–27L career · no lines in 2025
<1%67%33%
2.94
3
Angela Pitt
74W–49L career · no lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
2.88
Timothy Brand
100W–68L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
2.78
Rylee Mowery
25W–6L career · no lines in 2025
0%5%95%
2.73
Judy Campbell
39W–100L career · no lines in 2025
74%26%<1%
2.41

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.