Teams

Landis/Shaver/LR/Reb

2025 Combo 55 & Over 7.5 · 7.5 Men (LOCAL LEAGUE AT STATE)

9 players · average NTRP 3.75 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-11-09vs AR 7.5M 55 & Over (Pautsch)Lost 12
L#1 DoublesDaniel Lazenby / John Ramsay vs James Carr / Rickard Hood5-7, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesLanny Landis / DOUG GOLDEN vs Max Garcia / Ed Rogers6-1, 6-4
L#3 DoublesJon Erie / Roger Weldon vs Kyden Reeh / Sean Mahoney0-6, 4-6
2025-11-09vs AR 7.5M 55 & Over (Pautsch)Won 21
W#1 DoublesJonathan Johnson / Ryan Oyos vs Ryan Rieger / Brent Jimenez2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDaniel Lazenby / DOUG GOLDEN vs Max Garcia / Paul Hurley6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesJon Erie / John Ramsay vs Kyden Reeh / Sean Mahoney1-6, 0-6
2025-11-08vs AR 7.5M 55 & Over (Pautsch)Won 21
W#1 DoublesDaniel Lazenby / David Newton vs James Carr / Rickard Hood6-3, 7-6
W#2 DoublesJonathan Johnson / Roger Weldon vs Richard Branam / Andy Watkins6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesLanny Landis / John Ramsay vs Sean Mahoney / Kyden Reeh2-6, 3-6
2025-11-08vs AR 7.5M 55 & Over (Pautsch)Lost 12
W#1 DoublesLanny Landis / DOUG GOLDEN vs Brent Jimenez / Ryan Rieger6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDaniel Lazenby / David Newton vs Max Garcia / Ed Rogers5-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesJoe Shaver / Ryan Oyos vs Kyden Reeh / Sean Mahoney2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 Men (LOCAL LEAGUE AT STATE) have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.67 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.23
Jonathan Johnson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.94
Daniel Lazenby
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.78
Jon Erie
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.72
Joe Shaver
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.57
Lanny Landis
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.52
DOUG GOLDEN
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.50
Roger Weldon
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.43
John Ramsay
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.31
Ryan Oyos
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

John Ramsay + Roger Weldon7260% games+5.4% vs expected
Joe Shaver + Lanny Landis2443% games−11.2% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jonathan Johnson
16W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
4.23
4
Daniel Lazenby
21W–16L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%66%34%
3.94
Jon Erie
6W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.78
Joe Shaver
25W–23L career · 1 line in 2025
6%92%2%
3.72
Lanny Landis
20W–15L career · 3 lines in 2025
31%69%<1%
3.57
3.5
DOUG GOLDEN
24W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%44%56%
3.52
Roger Weldon
27W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%49%51%
3.50
John Ramsay
20W–18L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%68%32%
3.43
Ryan Oyos
21W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%89%9%
3.31

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.