Teams

Rodgers 5.5 Combo

2026 Combo Doubles 18&Over-NC · Women 5.5

9 players · average NTRP 2.88 / MISSISSIPPI

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2026-08-27vs Mann CCOLost 03
L#1 DoublesKatie Morrison / Sherri Spragins vs Emma Gaines / Elizabeth Lyn5-7, 0-6
L#2 DoublesAlexandra Peters / Brooke Mcauley vs Leslie Sivley / Libby Zoghby4-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesKatherine Shook / Amanda Weaver vs Priscilla Hawkins / Paige Dodgen4-6, 4-6
2026-08-23vs Touchstone - NC - SouthavenWon 30
W#1 DoublesBrandi Tomlinson / Brooke Mcauley vs Tammy Robertson / Danielle Paxton7-6, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSherri Spragins / Kristen Long vs Madeline Skehan / Kimberly Williams7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCaroline Shaffett / Katie Morrison vs Marin Touchstone / Allison Fowler6-4, 6-2
2026-08-15vs DOYLE - The And OversLost 12
W#1 DoublesAlexandra Peters / Katie Morrison vs Yongqin Zhang / Kim Yount6-2, 7-5
L#2 DoublesMarley Gant / Katherine Shook vs Ruth Potter / Michelle Corbin3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesAmanda Weaver / Katie Reynolds vs Samantha Phillips / Jennifer Doyle5-7, 7-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 5.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.40 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.93
Bailey Rodgers
published 3
2.75
Brandi Tomlinson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.70
Alexandra Peters
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.39
Marley Gant
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.25
Kristen Long
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.22
Caroline Shaffett
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.05
Katie Reynolds
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
1.93
Katherine Shook
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Sherri Spragins
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Bailey Rodgers
17W–9L career · no lines in 2026
<1%70%30%
2.93
3
Brandi Tomlinson
23W–35L career · 1 line in 2026
3%93%4%
2.75
3
Alexandra Peters
8W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
2.70
Marley Gant
3W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
0%78%22%
2.39
Kristen Long
2W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
0%96%4%
2.25
2.5
Caroline Shaffett
4W–2L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
0%98%2%
2.22
Katie Reynolds
1W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.05
Katherine Shook
0W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.93
Sherri Spragins
3W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.