Teams

Touchstone - NC - Southaven

2026 Combo Doubles 18&Over-NC · Women 5.5

10 players · average NTRP 2.58 / MISSISSIPPI

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2026-08-24vs AndersonWon 21
W#1 DoublesTammy Robertson / Christa Smith vs Destiny Davis / Julia Magness6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesKimberly Williams / Arielle Santander vs Mary Dye / Nicole Omeliantschuk3-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesMarti Montgomery / Madeline Skehan vs WENDY Vines / Tracy Gallagher6-3, 7-6
2026-08-23vs Rodgers 5.5 ComboLost 03
L#1 DoublesTammy Robertson / Danielle Paxton vs Brandi Tomlinson / Brooke Mcauley6-7, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMadeline Skehan / Kimberly Williams vs Sherri Spragins / Kristen Long7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMarin Touchstone / Allison Fowler vs Caroline Shaffett / Katie Morrison4-6, 2-6
2026-08-16vs Mann CCOLost 12
L#1 DoublesMarti Montgomery / Danielle Paxton vs Priscilla Hawkins / Emma Gaines1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesCeleste Wilson / Christa Smith vs Haley Mann / Hillary Welton6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesKimberly Williams / Allison Fowler vs Katy Shields / Margaret Baker1-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 5.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.33 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.62
Marti Montgomery
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.58
Celeste Wilson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.43
Christa Smith
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 2.5
2.38
Marin Touchstone
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.33
Terra Bowling
published
2.32
Arielle Santander
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.25
Madeline Skehan
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.24
Danielle Paxton
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 2.5
2.20
Connie Clarkson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.00
Allison Fowler
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Danielle Paxton + Christa Smith2347% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Marti Montgomery
26W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%20%80%
2.62
3
Celeste Wilson
17W–13L career · 1 line in 2026
28%72%<1%
2.58
2.5
Christa Smith
13W–15L career · type S · 5 lines in 2026
0%69%31%
2.43
Marin Touchstone
6W–21L career · 1 line in 2026
0%81%19%
2.38
Terra Bowling
10W–13L career · no lines in 2026
0%89%11%
2.33
2.5
Arielle Santander
3W–2L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
0%90%10%
2.32
Madeline Skehan
2W–2L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%96%4%
2.25
2.5
Danielle Paxton
5W–11L career · type S · 5 lines in 2026
0%97%3%
2.24
2.5
Connie Clarkson
10W–16L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
0%98%2%
2.20
2.5
Allison Fowler
4W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.00

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.