Teams

Netchix-Greenblatt/Mori

2021 One Doubles · 3.0 Women

3 players · average NTRP 3.5 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.26 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.69
Nina Hanson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.13
Maya Mori
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.95
Catherine Greenblatt
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Results7 ties
2021-08-04Won 10
W#1 DoublesCatherine Greenblatt / Maya Mori vs Kayla Casebeer / Jeri Finn6-4, 1-6, 1-0
2021-07-15Lost 01
L#1 DoublesMaya Mori / Catherine Greenblatt vs Rachel Young / Brooke Daniel7-5, 6-4
2021-07-11Won 10
W#1 DoublesMaya Mori / Nina Hanson vs Sarie Crothers / Kelsey McGinnis6-4, 7-6
2021-06-24Lost 01
L#1 DoublesCatherine Greenblatt / Nina Hanson vs Amy Thomas / Lisa McBee6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2021-06-21Won 10
W#1 DoublesCatherine Greenblatt / Nina Hanson vs Autumn Bunch / Jasmin Brown6-4, 6-2
2021-06-11Won 10
W#1 DoublesNina Hanson / Maya Mori vs Christie Herkert / Hilary Johnson6-1, 3-6, 1-0
2021-06-09Won 10
W#1 DoublesCatherine Greenblatt / Maya Mori vs Emily Shields / Deb Elmgren6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Nina Hanson
110W–57L career
4%96%0%
3.69
3.5
Maya Mori
86W–77L career
10%90%0%
3.13
3
Catherine Greenblatt
52W–81L career
0%88%12%
2.95

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.