Teams

BTC:HighFives:Wood/Dulz

2021 NCT Adult 55 & Over Women · 7.0 Women Div 1

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTHERN CONNECTICUT

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2021-04-25vs MLM:Matchmakers:Rokicki/MoodyWon 30
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Crabtree / Trudy Pearce vs Janice Parla / Anne Marie Choquette6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesNancy Dulz / Roxane Fromson vs Pamela Moody / Pat Kaliszewski6-7, 5-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLaura Eilers / Debra Wood vs Karen van Kruiningen / Sara Mulligan6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2021-04-11vs SIMS:Double Trouble:Sahl/TraceskiWon 30
W#1 DoublesLucy Ferriss / Trudy Pearce vs Beckie Sahl / Tracy Tietje3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesNancy Dulz / Laura Eilers vs Alexandra Bates / Willi Bowman6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesClaudia Goodman / Lynn Pollack vs Julie Geyer / Judi Levin6-2, 6-3
2021-03-28vs GTC:Net Gains:Kehoe/HaleWon 21
W#1 DoublesTrudy Pearce / Elizabeth Crabtree vs Margaret Kehoe / Rhonda Schwarz6-2, 7-5
W#2 DoublesNancy Dulz / Roxane Fromson vs Donna Bonin / Janet Belval6-7, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDebra Wood / Laura Eilers vs Gretchen Shea / Karen Gillis6-7, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 Women Div 1 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.02 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Claudia Goodman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Elizabeth Crabtree
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.02
Roxane Fromson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Amy Roebelen
published
Laura Eilers
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
Lucy Ferriss
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Lynn Pollack
published
Marilyn Brody
published
Nancy Dulz
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Trudy Pearce
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Trudy Pearce + Marilyn Brody1440% games−11.0% vs expected
Lucy Ferriss + Lynn Pollack4548% gamesnot enough data
Trudy Pearce + Elizabeth Crabtree3252% gamesnot enough data
Nancy Dulz + Claudia Goodman044 matchesnot enough data
Roxane Fromson + Nancy Dulz213 matchesnot enough data
Roxane Fromson + Claudia Goodman123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Claudia Goodman
6W–17L career · type S · 1 line in 2021
not enough data
3.5
Elizabeth Crabtree
4W–3L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
Roxane Fromson
24W–49L career · 2 lines in 2021
44%56%<1%
3.02
Amy Roebelen
0W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Laura Eilers
16W–50L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data
Lucy Ferriss
24W–29L career · 1 line in 2021
not enough data
Lynn Pollack
28W–24L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Marilyn Brody
9W–17L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Nancy Dulz
18W–32L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Trudy Pearce
63W–83L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.