Teams

WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC 55MX7.0A

2024 MIXED 55&Over · 55&Over MX7.0

18 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
W#1 DoublesLani Aurelius / Jeff Bennett vs Christine Meng / Tom Betts3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2024-10-16vs DIAMOND HILLS 55MX7.0AWon 10
W#1 DoublesLani Aurelius / Jeff Bennett vs Olga Candelario / Gerard Rose6-1, 6-3
L#1 DoublesLani Aurelius / Greg Backens vs Lisa Italia / Darien Lum4-6, 1-6
2024-08-25vs ROUND HILL CC 55MX7.0AWon 10
W#2 DoublesLani Aurelius / Greg Backens vs Janice Cain / Gary Cain6-0, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 55&Over MX7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.25 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.54
Jeff Bennett
published
3.43
Kimba Warford
published
3.42
Derek Daymond
published 3.5
3.36
Regina Hughes
published
3.35
Julie Golinski
published
3.30
Mark Vella
published 3.5
3.29
David Pintado
published 3.5
3.27
Lani Aurelius
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.26
Miwon Vella
published
3.22
Joel Warford
published
3.17
Cynthia Attiyeh
published 3.5
3.16
Sharon Sintchak
published
3.13
Greg Snyder
published
3.11
Lori Guariento
published
3.00
Rob Corder
published
2.93
Glenn Mcbee
published
Greg Backens
published
Suzanne Garrett
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mark Vella + Lori Guariento134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jeff Bennett
16W–14L career · no lines in 2024
<1%38%62%
3.54
Kimba Warford
21W–8L career · no lines in 2024
<1%68%32%
3.43
3.5
Derek Daymond
20W–16L career · no lines in 2024
<1%72%27%
3.42
Regina Hughes
38W–26L career · no lines in 2024
<1%83%16%
3.36
Julie Golinski
20W–5L career · no lines in 2024
1%85%15%
3.35
3.5
Mark Vella
31W–40L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%8%
3.30
3.5
David Pintado
5W–5L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%7%
3.29
Lani Aurelius
187W–146L career · 4 lines in 2024
2%92%5%
3.27
Miwon Vella
24W–23L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.26
Joel Warford
8W–10L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%2%
3.22
3.5
Cynthia Attiyeh
11W–21L career · type A · no lines in 2024
11%88%1%
3.17
Sharon Sintchak
3W–4L career · no lines in 2024
13%86%1%
3.16
Greg Snyder
7W–7L career · no lines in 2024
18%81%<1%
3.13
Lori Guariento
10W–9L career · no lines in 2024
22%78%<1%
3.11
Rob Corder
10W–9L career · no lines in 2024
51%49%<1%
3.00
Glenn Mcbee
8W–15L career · no lines in 2024
<1%69%31%
2.93
Greg Backens
5W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Suzanne Garrett
3W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.