Teams

V - Las Posas Angels

2021 USTA Adult 40 &Over · Ventura - Women 3.0 WE

10 players · average NTRP 3.00 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-08-01Won 10
W#2 DoublesKeri Kettle / Gina Howey vs Cindi Feig / Catherine Haywood6-4, 1-6, 1-0
2021-07-24Won 10
W#1 DoublesBeverly Torres / Wendy Spasiano vs Jennifer Anderson / Natalie Bocchi-Friedman7-6, 7-5
2021-07-18vs V - Valle Lindo Volley GirlsWon 10
W#1 DoublesGina Howey / Susan Custance vs Robin Butterfield / Julie Saltoun5-7, 7-5, 1-0
2021-07-11vs V - Moorpark GirlfriendsWon 10
W#2 DoublesGina Howey / Keri Kettle vs Linda Egan / Gizelda Parr6-3, 7-5
2021-06-21vs V - LLW-SunsetOohLaLa-J PruettLost 01
L#1 DoublesBeverly Torres / Susan Custance vs Kimberlin Morley / Dana Lawrence0-6, 4-6
2021-06-13vs V - North Ranch WeekendersWon 10
W#1 DoublesBeverly Torres / Susan Custance vs Susan Bender / Susie Harradine6-1, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Ventura - Women 3.0 WE have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.70 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.97
Elizabeth Pozzi
published 3
2.90
Lisa ONeil
published
2.86
Beverly Torres
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.74
Gina Howey
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.57
Carol Pollock
published 3
2.54
Janet Talmadge
published
2.51
Susan Custance
published
2.50
Keri Kettle
published
Theresa Yamamoto
published
Wendy Spasiano
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Beverly Torres + Gina Howey11852% games+4.5% vs expected
Carol Pollock + Janet Talmadge123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Elizabeth Pozzi
79W–60L career · no lines in 2021
<1%59%41%
2.97
Lisa ONeil
7W–2L career · no lines in 2021
<1%78%22%
2.90
3
Beverly Torres
34W–51L career · 3 lines in 2021
<1%86%13%
2.86
3
Gina Howey
44W–44L career · 3 lines in 2021
3%94%2%
2.74
3
Carol Pollock
2W–4L career · no lines in 2021
30%70%<1%
2.57
Janet Talmadge
2W–10L career · no lines in 2021
36%64%<1%
2.54
Susan Custance
3W–7L career · no lines in 2021
48%52%<1%
2.51
Keri Kettle
2W–4L career · no lines in 2021
49%51%<1%
2.50
Theresa Yamamoto
1W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Wendy Spasiano
0W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.