Teams

V - LLW-SunsetOohLaLa-J Pruett

2021 USTA Adult 40 &Over · Ventura - Women 3.0 WE

9 players · average NTRP 3.38 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-08-08vs V - North Ranch WeekendersWon 10
W#1 DoublesJodi Pruett / Beatriz Rivera vs Silvia Benun / Natalie Bocchi-Friedman0-6, 7-6, 1-0
2021-07-24vs V - Valle Lindo Volley GirlsSplit 11
L#1 DoublesLeah Cassar / Jodi Pruett vs Cathy Kim / Alicia Sim4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesRaymi Schwartz / Sarah Radford vs Debra Myrent / Judith Cade6-3, 6-3
2021-07-23vs V - North Ranch WeekendersWon 10
W#2 DoublesRaymi Schwartz / Beatriz Rivera vs Jennifer Anderson / LAURA BROWN7-5, 7-5
2021-06-21vs V - Las Posas AngelsWon 10
W#2 DoublesBeatriz Rivera / Raymi Schwartz vs Janet Talmadge / Maria Wascher6-2, 6-4
2021-06-19vs V - Valle Lindo Volley GirlsWon 10
W#2 DoublesRaymi Schwartz / Janice Pinnell vs Anne Renard / Debra Myrent6-2, 6-4
2021-06-07vs V - Spanish Hills Glamour SlammersLost 01
L#1 DoublesJodi Pruett / Dana Lawrence vs Dana Hibner / Katherine Weckhurst2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Ventura - Women 3.0 WE have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.93 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.45
Ina Kim
published 3.5
3.39
Janice Pinnell
published
3.24
Dana Lawrence
published 3.5
2.98
Raymi Schwartz
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.96
Leah Cassar
published
2.75
Kimberlin Morley
published
2.70
Jodi Pruett
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.69
Beatriz Rivera
published 3
2.23
PAMELA COLBERT
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Janice Pinnell + Ina Kim303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Ina Kim
14W–10L career · no lines in 2021
<1%66%34%
3.45
Janice Pinnell
9W–6L career · no lines in 2021
<1%80%20%
3.39
3.5
Dana Lawrence
6W–3L career · no lines in 2021
3%94%2%
3.24
3.5
Raymi Schwartz
111W–147L career · type A · 4 lines in 2021
56%44%<1%
2.98
Leah Cassar
2W–3L career · no lines in 2021
62%38%<1%
2.96
Kimberlin Morley
9W–7L career · no lines in 2021
3%95%3%
2.75
Jodi Pruett
126W–95L career · 3 lines in 2021
6%93%1%
2.70
3
Beatriz Rivera
8W–18L career · no lines in 2021
7%92%1%
2.69
PAMELA COLBERT
0W–5L career · no lines in 2021
98%2%<1%
2.23

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.