Teams

V - Spanish Hills Glamour Slammers

2021 USTA Adult 40 &Over · Ventura - Women 3.0 WE

9 players · average NTRP 3.17 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2021-08-07vs V - Las Posas AngelsWon 10
W#1 DoublesCarrie Kelleher / Mary Ann Fermin vs Susan Custance / Keri Kettle6-4, 6-4
2021-08-05vs V - North Ranch WeekendersWon 10
W#1 SinglesJustine Abbitt vs Amparo Rios-Davis3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2021-07-31vs V - Valle Lindo Volley GirlsWon 10
W#1 DoublesMary Ann Fermin / Maria Eddy vs Julie Saltoun / Alicia Sim6-3, 7-5
2021-07-25vs V - Moorpark GirlfriendsLost 02
L#1 DoublesKatherine Weckhurst / Mary Ann Fermin vs Beth Bloomfield / Kathryn Pisaro6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesJustine Abbitt vs Patricia Ameca1-6, 4-6
2021-07-10vs V - Valle Lindo Volley GirlsLost 01
L#1 DoublesEllen Swagerty / Mary Ann Fermin vs Cathy Kim / Judith Cade3-6, 1-6
2021-06-26vs V - Moorpark GirlfriendsWon 10
W#1 DoublesMary Ann Fermin / Akshatha Gangadhar vs Beth Bloomfield / Mary Coladonato6-7, 7-6, 1-0
2021-06-07vs V - LLW-SunsetOohLaLa-J PruettLost 01
L#1 SinglesMary Ann Fermin vs Ina Kim6-4, 4-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Ventura - Women 3.0 WE have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.96 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.49
Dana Hibner
published 3.5
3.29
Carrie Kelleher
published 3.5
3.13
Nina Ahuja
published
2.93
Mary Ann Fermin
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #1 Singles 17% · published 3
2.80
Ellen Swagerty
published 3
2.79
2.69
Justine Abbitt
usually #1 Singles 86%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published 3
2.53
Katherine Weckhurst
published
Lani Jue
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mary Ann Fermin + Justine Abbitt2541% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Dana Hibner
74W–72L career · no lines in 2021
<1%52%48%
3.49
3.5
Carrie Kelleher
10W–7L career · no lines in 2021
1%93%5%
3.29
Nina Ahuja
6W–6L career · no lines in 2021
<1%17%83%
3.13
3
Mary Ann Fermin
105W–78L career · 6 lines in 2021
<1%70%30%
2.93
3
Ellen Swagerty
14W–11L career · no lines in 2021
1%93%6%
2.80
3
Akshatha Gangadhar
2W–8L career · no lines in 2021
1%94%5%
2.79
3
Justine Abbitt
60W–83L career · 7 lines in 2021
7%92%1%
2.69
Katherine Weckhurst
5W–3L career · no lines in 2021
40%60%<1%
2.53
Lani Jue
1W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.