Teams

CV-Desert Princess/Carolyn Wright

2023 SCTA Tri-Level - CV · CV Women 4.0

13 players · average NTRP 3.57 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-05-27Won 10
W#1 DoublesAlicia Villarino / Nancy Closson vs Colleen Ecker / Julee Collins6-1, 6-2
2023-05-20vs CV-The Springs/SlottLost 01
L#2 DoublesPatricia Baughman / Carolyn Wright vs Carrie Morton / Susan D Morin4-6, 2-6
2023-05-13vs CV-Sun City PD/KimLost 01
L#1 DoublesJoanne Mezin / Manuela Andrews vs Nadine Kim / Lorna Matthew5-7, 4-6
2023-05-07vs CV-Palm Springs TC/RamosWon 10
W#1 DoublesAlicia Villarino / Nancy Closson vs Sally Sterling / Marjo Hull6-4, 6-2
2023-04-15vs CV-The Springs/SlottLost 01
L#1 DoublesBozena Barris / Joanne Mezin vs Donna Wrigley / Kate Slott0-6, 0-6
2023-04-08vs CV-Sun City PD/KimWon 10
W#2 DoublesDianne Dalton / Carolyn Wright vs Barbara McDonald / Lori Tanking6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for CV Women 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.34 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.85
Alicia Villarino
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.79
Jane Whitney
published
3.70
Bozena Barris
published 4
3.68
Brooke Russo
published 4
3.51
Joanne Mezin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.27
Dianne Dalton
published 3.5
3.16
Carolyn Wright
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.94
Nancy Pacharzina
published
2.81
Erica Carpenter
published 3
2.69
Ann Robinow
published 3
Nancy Closson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Patricia Baughman
published
Susan Caruso
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Alicia Villarino
65W–13L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%86%13%
3.85
Jane Whitney
7W–0L career · no lines in 2023
1%93%6%
3.79
4
Bozena Barris
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
6%93%1%
3.70
4
Brooke Russo
3W–7L career · no lines in 2023
8%91%1%
3.68
Joanne Mezin
4W–19L career · 2 lines in 2023
48%52%<1%
3.51
3.5
Dianne Dalton
7W–8L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Carolyn Wright
93W–84L career · 4 lines in 2023
11%88%<1%
3.16
Nancy Pacharzina
4W–6L career · no lines in 2023
>99%<1%<1%
2.94
3
Erica Carpenter
3W–1L career · no lines in 2023
1%92%7%
2.81
3
Ann Robinow
5W–12L career · no lines in 2023
7%92%1%
2.69
Nancy Closson
157W–86L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Patricia Baughman
6W–6L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Susan Caruso
12W–7L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.