Teams

CV-The Springs/Slott

2023 SCTA Tri-Level - CV · CV Women 4.0

15 players · average NTRP 3.70 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2023-05-20vs CV-Desert Princess/Carolyn WrightLost 01
L#3 DoublesPatty Booth / Eileen Martin vs Erica Carpenter / Nancy Pacharzina1-6, 2-6
2023-05-03vs LLW-CV-Rancho La Quinta/YoungWon 10
W#1 DoublesCarole Myser / Kimberly Skorupa vs Claire Seibly / Katie Buechel6-3, 6-4
2023-04-26vs CV-Palm Springs TC/RamosLost 02
L#1 DoublesKimberly Skorupa / Diane Friedman vs Ashley Matkin / Doris Hoffmann4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesLori Gill / Stephania Denton vs Lorene Peirce / Andrea Primer1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesJane Peller / Patty Booth vs Camille Elliott / Sherri Nickerson6-4, 3-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for CV Women 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.32 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.02
Carole Myser
published 4.5
3.80
Donna Wrigley
published
3.72
Kimberly Skorupa
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.68
Kate Slott
published
3.47
Susan D Morin
published
3.30
Denise Roethenmund
published 3.5
3.19
Patrice Jackson
published
3.16
Carrie Morton
published 4
3.04
Stephania Denton
published
2.74
Jane Peller
published
2.36
Samantha Samulis
published 2.5
Eileen Martin
published
Hannelore Neumann
published
Lori Gill
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Patty Booth
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Carole Myser
32W–33L career · no lines in 2023
45%55%<1%
4.02
Donna Wrigley
5W–2L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%8%
3.80
4
Kimberly Skorupa
134W–138L career · 5 lines in 2023
5%92%2%
3.72
Kate Slott
7W–4L career · no lines in 2023
10%89%1%
3.68
Susan D Morin
17W–6L career · no lines in 2023
<1%58%42%
3.47
3.5
Denise Roethenmund
12W–11L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%8%
3.30
Patrice Jackson
6W–8L career · no lines in 2023
9%90%1%
3.19
4
Carrie Morton
11W–6L career · no lines in 2023
99%1%<1%
3.16
Stephania Denton
16W–23L career · no lines in 2023
39%61%<1%
3.04
Jane Peller
24W–63L career · no lines in 2023
4%93%3%
2.74
2.5
Samantha Samulis
9W–15L career · no lines in 2023
0%84%16%
2.36
Eileen Martin
6W–13L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Hannelore Neumann
2W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Lori Gill
15W–35L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Patty Booth
17W–30L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.