Teams

CV-Indian Wells TG/Sherri Nickerson

2023 SCTA Tri-Level - CV · CV Women 4.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.38 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2023-04-22vs CV-Sun City PD/KimLost 02
L#2 DoublesJennifer Charron / Jacqueline Orr vs Jill Delaney / Lori Tanking4-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesJoann Bailin / Camille Elliott vs Catherine Petitti / Heidi Kelly6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2023-04-15vs LLW-CV-Rancho La Quinta/YoungLost 02
L#2 DoublesTerry Castro-Oistad / Camille Elliott vs Brenda Ouimet / Lisa Hayes1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesSherri Nickerson / Jennifer Charron vs Hilary Quinn / Heather Black2-6, 2-6
2023-04-08vs CV-The Springs/SlottWon 20
W#2 DoublesTammy Kitterman / Francesca Hitselberger vs Patrice Jackson / Denise Roethenmund7-5, 7-5
W#3 DoublesCamille Elliott / Sherri Nickerson vs Jane Peller / Patty Booth4-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for CV Women 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.16 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.44
Gayle Friedman
published
3.29
Maria Himelman
published
3.28
Jennifer Charron
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.17
Jessica Inserra
published
3.17
Tammy Kitterman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.10
Camille Elliott
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.04
Lori Kilburn
published
3.00
Joann Bailin
published
2.94
Bianca Mahon
published 3
Sherri Nickerson
published
Terry Castro-Oistad
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Joann Bailin + Bianca Mahon314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Gayle Friedman
12W–4L career · no lines in 2023
<1%67%33%
3.44
Maria Himelman
14W–3L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%7%
3.29
3.5
Jennifer Charron
92W–104L career · 2 lines in 2023
2%92%6%
3.28
Jessica Inserra
6W–3L career · no lines in 2023
11%88%1%
3.17
3.5
Tammy Kitterman
11W–17L career · type S · 1 line in 2023
11%88%1%
3.17
3.5
Camille Elliott
62W–64L career · 3 lines in 2023
23%77%<1%
3.10
Lori Kilburn
1W–6L career · no lines in 2023
>99%<1%<1%
3.04
Joann Bailin
11W–11L career · no lines in 2023
49%51%<1%
3.00
3
Bianca Mahon
8W–1L career · no lines in 2023
<1%67%33%
2.94
Francesca Hitselberger
1W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Sherri Nickerson
5W–5L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Terry Castro-Oistad
1W–5L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.