Teams

Broward/Newman

2025 Broward Combo 50 & Over · 8.5 Men

9 players · average NTRP 4.20 / REGION_8

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-09-25vs Midtown/DiegoSplit 11
L#1 DoublesGreg Brusey / Charles Johnson II vs PEDRO REGGIARDO / Luis Marchany6-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesBruce Kurtz / Alejandro Gonzalez vs Efrain Soler / Andres Cabrero6-4, 6-3
2025-09-16vs Piccolo/AlzuruWon 20
W#1 DoublesGreg Brusey / Charles Johnson II vs Jorge Corrales / Franco de Andreis7-5, 6-3
W#2 DoublesBruce Kurtz / Paul Newman vs Jorge Balsamo / Jorge Evaristo6-4, 6-3
2025-09-13vs Midtown/EttedguiWon 10
W#2 DoublesBruce Kurtz / Paul Newman vs Kenny Torrellas / John Jimenez6-2, 0-6, 1-0
2025-08-26vs Midtown/EttedguiLost 01
L#2 DoublesBruce Kurtz / Alejandro Gonzalez vs Ivan Rojas / Enrique Bonifaz1-6, 4-6
2025-08-19vs Midtown/DiegoWon 20
W#1 DoublesBruce Kurtz / Paul Newman vs Diego Grimblat / Christian de Veer6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesGreg Brusey / Alejandro Gonzalez vs Alan Benarroch / Luis Marchany6-2, 6-3
2025-08-12vs Piccolo/AlzuruWon 10
W#2 DoublesBruce Kurtz / Alejandro Gonzalez vs GABRIELE GHINI / Tony Alzuru4-6, 7-5, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.07 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.39
Bruce Kurtz
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 4.5
4.38
Greg Brusey
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.30
Ronen Bickel
published
4.16
Stephen Markward
published
3.96
Santiago Restrepo
published
3.93
Paul Newman
published
3.89
3.84
Ernesto Perez
published 4
3.81
Charles Johnson II
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stephen Markward + Bruce Kurtz4262% games+10.1% vs expected
Paul Newman + Santiago Restrepo11361% games−9.8% vs expected
Charles Johnson II + Bruce Kurtz7459% gamesnot enough data
Charles Johnson II + Greg Brusey7168% gamesnot enough data
Stephen Markward + Ronen Bickel314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Bruce Kurtz
84W–59L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
4.39
4.5
Greg Brusey
52W–21L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
4.38
Ronen Bickel
5W–2L career · no lines in 2025
1%93%6%
4.30
Stephen Markward
17W–8L career · no lines in 2025
12%88%<1%
4.16
Santiago Restrepo
36W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%64%36%
3.96
Paul Newman
34W–11L career · no lines in 2025
<1%71%28%
3.93
4
Alejandro Gonzalez
22W–25L career · no lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
3.89
4
Ernesto Perez
12W–10L career · no lines in 2025
<1%89%11%
3.84
4
Charles Johnson II
147W–86L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%92%8%
3.81

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.