← Search

Paul Newman

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Parkland, FL
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
254 matches · 183W–71L · seasons 2016–2026
Match history254 matches
L
2026-11-01 · Florida/Ma/55&Over7.0M · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Alexey Rasskazov championship
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-7
W
2026-10-31 · Florida/Ma/55&Over7.0M · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Alexey Rasskazov championship
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-10-31 · Florida/Ma/55&Over7.0M · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Alexey Rasskazov championship
loading the estimate
0-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-10-30 · Florida/Ma/55&Over7.0M · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Alexey Rasskazov championship
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-10-30 · Florida/Ma/55&Over7.0M · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Alexey Rasskazov championship
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-10-30 · Florida/Ma/55&Over7.0M · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Alexey Rasskazov championship
loading the estimate
6-1, 7-5
W
2026-10-20 · Quigley/Newman · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Radu Carean
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-10-13 · Quigley/Newman · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with RENE LOPEZ
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-10-08 · Parkland/Ma · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Todd Victor
loading the estimate
4-6, 5-7
W
2026-10-06 · Quigley/Newman · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Santiago Restrepo
loading the estimate
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-09-15 · Parkland/Newman · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with JOSE MEJIA
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-09-08 · Parkland/Newman · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Ronen Bickel
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams46 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
3.0
80%
4W–1L · 50.9% of games
4.0
78.3%
108W–30L · 57.3% of games
4.5
14.3%
3W–18L · 31.5% of games
5.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0
71.4%
10W–4L · 55.3% of games
8.0
80%
20W–5L · 60.9% of games
8.5
83.9%
26W–5L · 61.7% of games
9.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
9.0mixed
0%
0W–4L · 33.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 31% of the time
#1 Doubles
31%
78 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
71 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
69 matches
#1 Singles
6%
14 matches
Singles
5%
12 matches
#2 Singles
2%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The moment of victory is much too short to live for that and nothing else.
Martina Navratilova