Teams

Ky/Lex/Ingram

2025 USTA LEAGUE 18 & Over ADULT LEXINGTON · Men 2.5 2nd Session

7 players · average NTRP 2.75 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-05-14vs Fox 2.5 2nd SessionWon 21
W#1 DoublesAndre Green / Vinny Paiva vs Steven Ahler / John Webb6-0, 6-1
W#1 SinglesCesar Tovar vs Mike Bensing3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMichael Pekrul / Erik Davidshofer vs Theodore Swansegar / Maher Sarieh3-6, 4-6
2025-04-30vs Fox 2.5 2nd SessionWon 30
W#1 DoublesJosh Grueter / Vinny Paiva vs Theodore Swansegar / John Webb6-0, 2-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesAndre Green vs Mike Bensing6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesErik Davidshofer / Cesar Tovar vs Matt Julien / Steven Ahler6-2, 6-2
2025-04-12vs Fox 2.5 2nd SessionWon 20
W#1 DoublesAndre Green / John Stewart vs Steven Ahler / Maher Sarieh4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#1 SinglesVinny Paiva vs Josh Armenta6-0, 7-5
2025-04-05vs Fox 2.5 2nd SessionSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJosh Grueter / Vinny Paiva vs Matt Julien / John Webb6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesErik Davidshofer / Charles Ray vs Steven Ahler / Ivan Rice1-6, 6-1, 0-1
2025-03-18vs Fox 2.5 2nd SessionWon 21
W#1 DoublesJohn Stewart / Andre Green vs Steven Ahler / Andre Regard6-1, 6-0
L#1 SinglesMichael Pekrul vs Mike Bensing1-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesCharles Ray / Cesar Tovar vs Maher Sarieh / Josh Armenta5-7, 6-3, 1-0
2025-02-20vs Fox 2.5 2nd SessionWon 10
W#2 DoublesVinny Paiva / Theodore Swansegar vs Steven Ahler / Maher Sarieh6-1, 6-4
2025-02-03vs Fox 2.5 2nd SessionLost 01
L#1 SinglesVinny Paiva vs Mike Bensing2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-01-19vs Fox 2.5 2nd SessionLost 01
L#2 DoublesVinny Paiva / John Sowards vs Mike Bensing / Ivan Rice2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men 2.5 2nd Session have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.76 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.01
Dustin Ingram
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.63
Andre Green
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3
2.63
Cesar Tovar
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 2.5
Erik Davidshofer
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Josh Grueter
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Michael Pekrul
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
Vinny Paiva
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #1 Singles 29% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Dustin Ingram
19W–26L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%47%53%
3.01
3
Andre Green
10W–7L career · 4 lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
2.63
2.5
Cesar Tovar
11W–2L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%17%83%
2.63
Erik Davidshofer
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Josh Grueter
5W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Michael Pekrul
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Vinny Paiva
5W–2L career · 7 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.