Teams

Snodgrass/Nashville

2025 Adult 18 & Over - Nashville · 4.5 Women - Tuesday AM

11 players · average NTRP 4.50 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-04-29vs Baskin/Vaughan/NashvilleSplit 22
L#1 DoublesMolly Murphy / Sarah Glass vs Megan Pope / Ashley Willis0-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesJamie Weiss vs Brittney Covington6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesNikki Sanz / Sarah Torrence vs Leslie Gilliam / Joni Covington6-2, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMarybeth Snodgrass / Michelle Salada vs Jessica Largen / Amanda Poole1-6, 5-7
2025-04-01vs Baskin/Vaughan/NashvilleLost 13
L#1 DoublesEmily Shapland / Veronica Allen vs MacKenzie Phillips / Thashia Garcia1-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesJamie Weiss vs Stacy Baskin6-1, 6-0
L#2 DoublesMichelle Salada / Molly Murphy vs Lindsey Vaughan / JESSICA ARNOLD1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesMarybeth Snodgrass / Lindsay Manifold vs Brittney Covington / Amanda Poole0-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5 Women - Tuesday AM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.94 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.24
Ashley Spirrison
published 4.5
4.21
Lindsay Manifold
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
4.20
Jamie Weiss
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
4.12
Veronica Allen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.98
Sarah Torrence
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
3.67
Marybeth Snodgrass
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.59
Michelle Salada
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.50
Donna Demouy
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Emily Shapland
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Nikki Sanz
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Sarah Glass
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michelle Salada + Donna Demouy123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Ashley Spirrison
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%3%
4.24
Lindsay Manifold
4W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
7%91%2%
4.21
Jamie Weiss
22W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
8%90%1%
4.20
Veronica Allen
5W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
20%80%<1%
4.12
Sarah Torrence
23W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%55%45%
3.98
Marybeth Snodgrass
21W–12L career · 4 lines in 2025
12%88%1%
3.67
Michelle Salada
12W–35L career · 3 lines in 2025
26%74%<1%
3.59
Donna Demouy
15W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
50%50%<1%
3.50
Emily Shapland
0W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Nikki Sanz
2W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Sarah Glass
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.