Teams

PLEASANTON 40AW3.5A

2025 ADULT 40&Over · Women's 3.5

18 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2025-02-15vs BAY CLUB COURTSIDE 40AW3.5DLost 01
L#1 SinglesDeborah Hao vs Camille Freeman0-6, 6-1, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women's 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.22 estimated across 18 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.48
Julie Gundermann
published
3.45
Cindy Turner
published 3.5
3.43
Robyn Schleifman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.38
Regina Hughes
published
3.36
3.33
Monique Caires
published
3.33
Petra Ahvenainen
published
3.27
Miwon Vella
published
3.27
Lani Aurelius
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.24
Lisa Saporito
published
3.23
Deborah Hao
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.17
Hui Chen
published 3.5
3.13
Yulia Costello
published
3.13
Samantha Ng
published
3.09
Wendy Schofield
published
3.07
Michelle Nagle
published
2.80
Traci Rebiejo
published
2.79
Tina Ly
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stephanie Chamberlin + Lisa Saporito5159% games+2.8% vs expected
Stephanie Chamberlin + Lani Aurelius213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Julie Gundermann
2W–6L career · no lines in 2025
55%45%<1%
3.48
3.5
Cindy Turner
19W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%65%35%
3.45
3.5
Robyn Schleifman
169W–123L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%70%30%
3.43
Regina Hughes
36W–26L career · no lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
3.38
Stephanie Chamberlin
21W–13L career · no lines in 2025
<1%86%14%
3.36
Monique Caires
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
91%9%<1%
3.33
Petra Ahvenainen
12W–4L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.33
Miwon Vella
23W–23L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.27
Lani Aurelius
187W–146L career · 6 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.27
Lisa Saporito
21W–16L career · no lines in 2025
3%95%2%
3.24
3.5
Deborah Hao
10W–25L career · 1 line in 2025
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Hui Chen
2W–19L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.17
Yulia Costello
10W–29L career · no lines in 2025
15%85%<1%
3.13
Samantha Ng
29W–13L career · no lines in 2025
<1%15%85%
3.13
Wendy Schofield
10W–13L career · no lines in 2025
25%75%<1%
3.09
Michelle Nagle
2W–7L career · no lines in 2025
31%69%<1%
3.07
Traci Rebiejo
8W–12L career · no lines in 2025
1%93%6%
2.80
Tina Ly
11W–18L career · no lines in 2025
1%93%6%
2.79

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.