Teams

MVCC SILVER

2024 CTA TWILIGHT - DEN · MEN 3.5 - TWILIGHT

8 players · average NTRP 3.40 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-09-03vs MC BLUELost 01
L#1 DoublesScott Newcomb / Steven Hardegen vs Teddy Evans / Michael McAuliffe6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2024-08-20vs RHCC ORANGESplit 11
W#1 DoublesChris Vogelsang / Ken Proc vs Bryan Dahler / Lee Tsuo7-5, 7-6
L#1 SinglesSteven Hardegen vs Kip Cranford3-6, 1-6
2024-08-13vs MC YELLOWLost 02
L#1 DoublesChris Vogelsang / Ken Proc vs Colin Wein / Brad Arnold3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesScott Newcomb / Steven Hardegen vs John Loomis / Thomas Crane6-7, 2-6
2024-08-12vs NJ PURPLELost 01
L#1 DoublesSteven Hardegen / Scott Newcomb vs Roger Phillips / Todd Taylor2-6, 0-6
2024-07-30vs BRMST NAVYWon 10
W#1 DoublesChris Vogelsang / Ken Proc vs Russell Hogan / Kenneth Swanwick6-5
2024-07-23vs LTC-M PURPLEWon 10
W#1 DoublesScott Newcomb / Steven Hardegen vs Joe Martinez / Nick Avila6-1, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 3.5 - TWILIGHT have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.30 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.52
Paul Schwabe
published
3.49
Chris Vogelsang
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.38
Ken Proc
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.34
Scott Newcomb
published
3.19
Steven Hardegen
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.09
Dave Evenson
published 3.5
3.09
John Mullins
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ken Proc + Paul Schwabe6067% games+11.1% vs expected
Steven Hardegen + Scott Newcomb3552% games+4.8% vs expected
Dave Evenson + John Mullins2351% games+4.7% vs expected
Ken Proc + Chris Vogelsang381058% games+0.7% vs expected
Dave Evenson + Scott Newcomb2441% games−13.0% vs expected
Chris Vogelsang + Steven Hardegen271057% gamesnot enough data
Dave Evenson + Steven Hardegen213 matchesnot enough data
Ken Proc + Steven Hardegen213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Paul Schwabe
28W–3L career · no lines in 2024
<1%43%57%
3.52
3.5
Chris Vogelsang
98W–31L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%52%48%
3.49
3.5
Ken Proc
53W–15L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%81%19%
3.38
Scott Newcomb
15W–17L career · no lines in 2024
1%87%12%
3.34
3.5
Steven Hardegen
71W–49L career · 5 lines in 2024
9%90%1%
3.19
3.5
Dave Evenson
9W–14L career · no lines in 2024
26%74%<1%
3.09
John Mullins
10W–32L career · no lines in 2024
27%73%<1%
3.09
3
Barnes Goutermout
1W–8L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.