Teams

MC BLUE

2024 CTA TWILIGHT - DEN · MEN 3.5 - TWILIGHT

7 players · average NTRP / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-09-03vs MVCC SILVERLost 12
W#1 DoublesTeddy Evans / Michael McAuliffe vs Scott Newcomb / Steven Hardegen6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesSterling Field vs Paul Schwabe1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesKirk Chatawanich / Paul Sylvester vs Barnes Goutermout / Dave Evenson3-6, 0-6
2024-08-27vs RHCC ORANGELost 12
W#1 DoublesMichael McAuliffe / Teddy Evans vs Bryan Dahler / Stephen Komon7-6, 6-4
L#1 SinglesKirk Chatawanich vs Paul Grumann6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSterling Field / Michael Ratkiewicz vs Corey Crawford / Paul Kos3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2024-08-20vs MC YELLOWLost 03
L#1 DoublesTeddy Evans / Sterling Field vs John Loomis / Brad Arnold1-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesKirk Chatawanich vs Colin Wein1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMichael Ratkiewicz / Scot Schneider vs Matthew Moskal / Charles Sprague2-6, 4-6
2024-08-17vs BRMST NAVYLost 02
L#1 DoublesTeddy Evans / Scot Schneider vs Kenneth Swanwick / Dan Golden3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesPaul Sylvester / Michael Ratkiewicz vs Robert Tedesco / Philip Cangilla1-6, 3-6
2024-08-13vs NJ PURPLEWon 21
W#1 DoublesTeddy Evans / Michael McAuliffe vs Conor Hansen / Sean Mitchell6-4, 6-2
L#1 SinglesKirk Chatawanich vs Roger Phillips3-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesScot Schneider / Paul Sylvester vs Gregory Idler / Sasha Shepard6-4, 6-4
2024-07-30vs BP REDWon 21
W#1 DoublesMichael McAuliffe / Teddy Evans vs David Lane / Jason Ortiz6-1, 7-5
W#1 SinglesKirk Chatawanich vs Harvey Wherry7-5, 6-4
L#2 DoublesScot Schneider / Sterling Field vs Nick Avila / Joe Martinez2-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 3.5 - TWILIGHT have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.70 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.70
Michael McAuliffe
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Kirk Chatawanich
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Michael Ratkiewicz
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Paul Sylvester
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Scot Schneider
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Sterling Field
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Teddy Evans
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Teddy Evans + Michael McAuliffe404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Michael McAuliffe
16W–5L career · 4 lines in 2024
6%93%1%
3.70
Kirk Chatawanich
3W–12L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data
Michael Ratkiewicz
6W–9L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Paul Sylvester
11W–29L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Scot Schneider
19W–49L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Sterling Field
11W–14L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Teddy Evans
4W–2L career · 6 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.