Teams

BP RED

2024 CTA TWILIGHT - DEN · MEN 3.5 - TWILIGHT

5 players · average NTRP 3.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-09-03vs RHCC ORANGEWon 21
W#1 DoublesJoe Martinez / David Lane vs Bryan Dahler / Lee Tsuo7-5, 4-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesNick Avila vs Mike Schrade1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesMaurice Murray / Harvey Wherry vs Michael Anderson / Paul Kos6-4, 7-5
2024-08-29vs BRMST NAVYWon 30
W#1 DoublesDavid Lane / Joe Martinez vs John Stewart / Dan Golden6-2, 6-2
W#1 SinglesNick Avila vs Perry May6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesMaurice Murray / Harvey Wherry vs Paul Fazzini / Kenneth Swanwick6-2, 6-4
2024-08-27vs MC YELLOWLost 12
L#1 DoublesNick Avila / Joe Martinez vs John Loomis / Brad Arnold4-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesDavid Lane vs Blair Eklund4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMaurice Murray / Harvey Wherry vs Thomas Crane / Matthew Moskal6-4, 7-5
2024-08-20vs NJ PURPLEWon 21
W#1 DoublesJoe Martinez / Jason Ortiz vs Todd Taylor / Conor Hansen6-4, 7-6
L#1 SinglesDavid Lane vs Trent Bonczynski3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesHarvey Wherry / Maurice Murray vs Scott Manzolillo / Sean Mitchell6-2, 6-1
2024-07-30vs MC BLUELost 12
L#1 DoublesDavid Lane / Jason Ortiz vs Michael McAuliffe / Teddy Evans1-6, 5-7
L#1 SinglesHarvey Wherry vs Kirk Chatawanich5-7, 4-6
W#2 DoublesNick Avila / Joe Martinez vs Scot Schneider / Sterling Field6-2, 7-5
2024-07-23vs MVCC SILVERWon 21
L#1 DoublesJoe Martinez / Nick Avila vs Scott Newcomb / Steven Hardegen1-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#1 SinglesJason Ortiz vs Dave Evenson6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDavid Lane / Maurice Murray vs John Mullins / Barnes Goutermout6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 3.5 - TWILIGHT have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.25 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.33
Jason Ortiz
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
3.26
David Lane
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.24
Maurice Murray
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.19
Harvey Wherry
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 3.5
Nick Avila
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Harvey Wherry + Maurice Murray7549% games+3.3% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jason Ortiz
33W–47L career · 3 lines in 2024
1%90%9%
3.33
3.5
David Lane
55W–50L career · 6 lines in 2024
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
Maurice Murray
25W–29L career · 5 lines in 2024
3%94%2%
3.24
3.5
Harvey Wherry
32W–66L career · 5 lines in 2024
8%91%1%
3.19
Nick Avila
28W–27L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.