Teams

STL-REG-Dickerson

Adult 18 & Over August 5-7, 2022 · 4.0 Men

14 players · average NTRP 4.00 / ST. LOUIS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings8 teams · 4.0 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1WC2- HOA-REG-Thyagarajan000000
2KS-REG-Jones/18&Over4.0M000000
3NE-REG-McFarley000000
4HOA-REG-Stroede/18&Over4.0M000000
5OK-Reg-Magann000000
6IA-REG-Jha&Hanson/18&Over4.0M000000
7STL-REG-Dickerson000000
8WC1-NE-Leahy000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.70 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.93
Robert Linden
published
3.85
Ralf Nosic
published
Charles Olagbegi
published 4
James Dixon
published 4
3.73
3.72
Nick Westphal
published
3.71
James Mense
published 4
3.67
Daniel Wyland
published 4
3.32
Richard Dickerson
published
Folahan Olishile
published
John Nash
published
Randolph Fauser
published
Scott Sindecuse
published
Tom le Pique
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nick Westphal + Christopher Temple4165% games+13.7% vs expected
James Mense + Robert Linden6073% games+12.8% vs expected
Folahan Olishile + James Dixon4161% games+8.7% vs expected
Scott Sindecuse + John Nash18457% games+7.5% vs expected
Scott Sindecuse + James Mense4455% games+3.2% vs expected
Randolph Fauser + Scott Sindecuse9457% games+2.6% vs expected
Folahan Olishile + John Nash5158% games+2.6% vs expected
Randolph Fauser + Nick Westphal5257% games+1.3% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Robert Linden
61W–43L career · no lines in 2022
<1%70%30%
3.93
Ralf Nosic
67W–34L career · no lines in 2022
87%13%<1%
3.85
4
Charles Olagbegi
39W–34L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4
James Dixon
13W–10L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Christopher Temple
53W–40L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.73
Nick Westphal
68W–43L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%2%
3.72
4
James Mense
74W–36L career · no lines in 2022
5%93%1%
3.71
4
Daniel Wyland
59W–42L career · no lines in 2022
9%90%1%
3.67
Richard Dickerson
27W–59L career · no lines in 2022
92%8%<1%
3.32
Folahan Olishile
52W–40L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
John Nash
50W–13L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Randolph Fauser
65W–55L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Scott Sindecuse
76W–37L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Tom le Pique
36W–14L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.