Teams

LLW - Team Tkac - Bako

2023 Adult 18 & Over - Bakersfield · Women's 4.0 - Bake

13 players · average NTRP 4.10 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2023-05-21vs Team SaldivarWon 10
W#2 DoublesLauren Eittreim / Briana Starr vs Rebecca Badgett / Linette Holliday7-5, 3-2
2023-05-06vs Team SaldivarLost 01
L#1 DoublesSally Goossen / Beth van Voorhis vs MacArena Casanova / Susan Frakes6-1, 4-6, 0-1
2023-04-23vs Team SaldivarWon 10
W#1 DoublesBeth van Voorhis / Leigh-Anne Fourie vs Carol Maier / Rhonda Slegers6-2, 6-4
2023-03-25vs Team SaldivarWon 10
W#2 DoublesBeth van Voorhis / Lauren Eittreim vs Christine Saldivar / Carol Maier7-5, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women's 4.0 - Bake have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.64 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.17
Leigh-Anne Fourie
published
3.94
Cindy Broussard
published 4.5
3.86
Briana Starr
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.76
Nikki Hiebert
published
3.74
Heather Tkac
published
3.73
Beth van Voorhis
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.62
Liza Chen
published
3.60
Lauren Eittreim
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.51
Kellie Dibble
published
3.49
Sara Paul
published
3.41
SENEA GARRIQUEZ
published
3.40
Sally Goossen
published
3.13
Andrea Ames
published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Briana Starr + Lauren Eittreim33365% games+7.8% vs expected
Heather Tkac + Sally Goossen4255% games+2.4% vs expected
Beth van Voorhis + Sally Goossen123 matchesnot enough data
Cindy Broussard + Kellie Dibble303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Leigh-Anne Fourie
3W–2L career · no lines in 2023
11%88%1%
4.17
4.5
Cindy Broussard
8W–2L career · no lines in 2023
67%33%<1%
3.94
4
Briana Starr
70W–12L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%83%16%
3.86
Nikki Hiebert
2W–2L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.76
Heather Tkac
11W–6L career · no lines in 2023
<1%4%96%
3.74
4
Beth van Voorhis
39W–22L career · 3 lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.73
Liza Chen
4W–6L career · no lines in 2023
<1%19%81%
3.62
4
Lauren Eittreim
57W–11L career · 6 lines in 2023
24%76%<1%
3.60
Kellie Dibble
5W–2L career · no lines in 2023
<1%48%52%
3.51
Sara Paul
4W–3L career · no lines in 2023
<1%52%48%
3.49
SENEA GARRIQUEZ
4W–11L career · no lines in 2023
<1%73%27%
3.41
Sally Goossen
6W–7L career · no lines in 2023
<1%<1%>99%
3.40
4
Andrea Ames
1W–6L career · no lines in 2023
>99%<1%<1%
3.13

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.