Teams

Wong-Herland (Day)

2025 SOUTH EAST TENNIS ADULT 55 & OVER · WOMEN 3.5

13 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2025-05-02vs Lemmons/Bringard DAYWon 10
W#3 DoublesBarbara Bloniarz / Susan Settle vs Patricia Thomson / Juanita Johnson5-7, 6-4, 1-0
2025-04-28vs Pelton Wall dayWon 10
W#3 DoublesAmy Craig / Barbara Bloniarz vs Cheryl Matsche / Susan Wilson6-3, 1-6, 1-0
2025-04-27vs Murray 3.5 55+Lost 01
L#3 DoublesBarbara Bloniarz / Amy Craig vs Shameena Broach / Christine Bean5-7, 6-7
2025-04-14vs Pennington/Kearney (Day)Won 10
W#3 DoublesBarbara Bloniarz / Stacey Johnson vs Ann Carmichael Prior / Kim Black6-0, 6-2
2025-04-07vs CAMPBELLLost 01
L#3 DoublesAmy Craig / Barbara Bloniarz vs Cara DAngelo / Linda Wilson6-3, 1-6, 0-1
2025-04-02vs Kontoulas/Toomey DayWon 10
W#3 DoublesBarbara Bloniarz / Pearl Wong vs Connie Wilson / Marlene Fricano6-0, 6-3
2025-03-29vs Davidson 3.5 55+Won 10
W#3 DoublesAmy Craig / Barbara Bloniarz vs Sarah McKenzie / Donna Jaeckel7-5, 7-5
2025-03-26vs Sample Spring 3.5Won 30
W#1 DoublesKelly Scheer / Pearl Wong vs Stephanie Markley / Vanessa Plotner6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesCheryl Herland / Rhonda VanSpeybroeck vs Ashby Neal / Betty Schedler6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesStacey Johnson / Susan Settle vs Kelly Stephens / Terry Thompkins6-1, 7-5
2025-03-23vs Tharrington/Messier DayWon 30
W#1 DoublesKelly Scheer / Kristina Marchisin vs Diana Messier / Maria Weese6-4, 7-5
W#2 DoublesCheryl Herland / Stacey Johnson vs Sherri Souza / Pamela Tharrington6-3, 7-6
W#3 DoublesPearl Wong / Susan Settle vs Kim Cesareo / Sharon Wesson6-3, 0-6, 1-0
2025-03-22vs Cozza/ArmeniWon 21
W#1 DoublesKristina Marchisin / Pearl Wong vs Marion Metcalf / Annette Greene6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesKelly Scheer / Janice Franks vs Gail Willis / Molly Bristol6-3, 6-0
L#3 DoublesMary Beth Chodnicki / Susan Settle vs Archana Gidwani / Brooklyn Graham Kennedy3-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.19 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.28
Kelly Scheer
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.27
Janice Franks
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Amy Craig
published 3.5
Charlene Gwinn
published 3.5
3.24
Barbara Bloniarz
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.23
Pearl Wong
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.21
Cheryl Herland
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.19
Kristina Marchisin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.17
Rhonda VanSpeybroeck
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.09
Mary Beth Chodnicki
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.02
Nancy Garland
published
Kim Provencher
published
Susan Settle
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kelly Scheer + Kristina Marchisin1448% games−6.9% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kelly Scheer
18W–12L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.28
Janice Franks
5W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Amy Craig
4W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Charlene Gwinn
2W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Barbara Bloniarz
44W–30L career · 7 lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.24
Pearl Wong
6W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
Cheryl Herland
5W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.21
Kristina Marchisin
16W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
8%90%1%
3.19
Rhonda VanSpeybroeck
12W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
11%88%1%
3.17
Mary Beth Chodnicki
1W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
27%73%<1%
3.09
Nancy Garland
4W–8L career · no lines in 2025
43%56%<1%
3.02
Kim Provencher
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Susan Settle
4W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.