Teams

SDNC 7.0 Morgan Run/ Rice

2022 Adult 55 & Over Summer- SDNC · SDNC - Women - 7.0

8 players · average NTRP 3.38 / SAN DIEGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
W#1 DoublesMeredith Priestley / Robyn Rice vs Jacqueline Campbell / Tessie Rivera6-1, 6-4
L#3 DoublesJan Hegstad / Patricia Malo vs Wendy Ravenel / Rebecca Baguio3-6, 3-6
2022-08-16vs SDNC 7.0 RBCTC/ NelsonSplit 11
W#1 DoublesMeredith Priestley / Robyn Rice vs Mary Ann Neder / Donna Tucker3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJan Hegstad / Gail Priest vs Sumiko Nelson / Judy Provol2-6, 4-6
W#1 DoublesMeredith Priestley / Robyn Rice vs Caresse Muir / Karen Rose7-5, 6-0
2022-07-19vs SDNC 7.0 El Camino CC/ WhitneyLost 01
L#2 DoublesJan Hegstad / Christine Johnson vs Florence Klein / Leona Lallier2-6, 3-6
L#1 DoublesRobyn Rice / Dorthe Smith vs Inge Bisconer / Gretchen McCoy1-6, 3-6
2022-07-05vs SDNC 7.0 RPTC/ LevineSplit 11
W#1 DoublesRobyn Rice / Dorthe Smith vs Jan Biundo / Norma Garrison6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJan Hegstad / Patricia Malo vs Sandi Casterline / Deborah Parks6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W#1 DoublesRobyn Rice / Meredith Priestley vs Helen Greis / Onay Havens6-4, 6-3
2022-06-21vs SDNC 7.0 Morgan Run/ SweatWon 10
W#1 DoublesRobyn Rice / Beth Newton vs Elizabeth Liotta / Rebekah Seidel7-5, 6-2
2022-06-14Won 10
W#1 DoublesMeredith Priestley / Robyn Rice vs Wendy Kellogg / Kathleen Koop6-3, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SDNC - Women - 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.97 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.40
Margie Jones
published
3.27
Christine Johnson
published 3.5
Gail Priest
published 3.5
2.95
Robyn Rice
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
2.71
Kathy Hale
published
2.50
Jan Hegstad
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
Jennifer Nestor
published
Patricia Malo
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Margie Jones
13W–9L career · no lines in 2022
<1%78%22%
3.40
3.5
Christine Johnson
45W–30L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Gail Priest
0W–3L career · type A · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Robyn Rice
103W–115L career · 10 lines in 2022
66%34%<1%
2.95
Kathy Hale
6W–3L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%1%
2.71
3
Jan Hegstad
12W–49L career · 4 lines in 2022
49%51%<1%
2.50
Jennifer Nestor
0W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Patricia Malo
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.