Teams

SDNC 7.0 Winners Tennis/ Bisconer (2:1)

2022 Adult 55 & Over Summer- SDNC · SDNC - Women - 7.0

8 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SAN DIEGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
L#1 DoublesInge Bisconer / Heidi Ulrich vs Ping Chen / Sandi Milstein-Ostrom0-6, 0-6
2022-08-16vs SDNC 7.0 Morgan Run/ SweatWon 10
W#1 DoublesInge Bisconer / Heidi Ulrich vs Rebekah Seidel / Cynthia Noet6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2022-08-09Won 10
W#2 DoublesGracie Jones / Heidi Ulrich vs Kathleen Koop / Nicole Holliday6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesDebra Schade / Heidi Ulrich vs Karan Huskey / Dianna Yao-Garcia2-6, 2-6
2022-07-26vs SDNC 7.0 RBCTC/ NelsonWon 10
W#1 DoublesInge Bisconer / Heidi Ulrich vs Suzanne Benke / Donna Tucker6-4, 6-4
2022-07-19vs SDNC 7.0 Fairbanks Ranch CC/ LamWon 10
W#1 DoublesInge Bisconer / Heidi Ulrich vs Katherine Lam / Lulu Lam6-4, 6-1
2022-07-12vs SDNC 7.0 Morgan Run/ RiceWon 10
W#3 DoublesCrista Hubbard / Heidi Ulrich vs Beth Newton / Kathy Hale7-6, 6-4
2022-07-05vs SDNC 7.0 Scripps Trails/ MacDonaldLost 01
L#2 DoublesCrista Hubbard / Heidi Ulrich vs Caresse Muir / Karen Rose3-6, 4-6
2022-06-28vs SDNC 7.0 El Camino CC/ WhitneyWon 10
W#1 DoublesInge Bisconer / Heidi Ulrich vs Leslie Dyerly / Beth Piper4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2022-06-14Lost 01
L#1 DoublesGretchen McCoy / Heidi Ulrich vs Debbie Furgal / Kimberly Boal5-7, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SDNC - Women - 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.24 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.63
Inge Bisconer
published 4
3.18
Debra Schade
published 3.5
3.08
Crista Hubbard
published 3.5
3.06
Heidi Ulrich
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published 3.5
Susie Burger
published 3
Martina Chapkis
published
Sara Cheng
published
Suzanne Concors
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Susie Burger + Inge Bisconer5549% gamesnot enough data
Martina Chapkis + Heidi Ulrich044 matchesnot enough data
Debra Schade + Heidi Ulrich224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Inge Bisconer
38W–41L career · no lines in 2022
16%84%<1%
3.63
3.5
Debra Schade
1W–3L career · no lines in 2022
8%91%1%
3.18
3.5
Crista Hubbard
0W–3L career · no lines in 2022
27%73%<1%
3.08
3.5
Heidi Ulrich
12W–27L career · 10 lines in 2022
31%69%<1%
3.06
3
Susie Burger
5W–10L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Martina Chapkis
0W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Sara Cheng
0W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Suzanne Concors
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.