Teams

Team 3 Summer ServAces

2024 NOVA Adult 40 & Over Summer · NOVA Adult 40 & Over 4.0 Men

11 players · average NTRP 3.86 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-07-23vs Team 2 High VoltageLost 01
L#2 DoublesStephen Worrall / Jonathan Ferrell vs Raj Indugula / Sai Maddi4-6, 5-5
2024-07-20Won 10
W#3 DoublesHynek Kalkus / Ted Breinig vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-07-17vs Team 5 Wise Ace GOATsWon 10
W#3 DoublesTed Breinig / Hynek Kalkus vs Milin Iyer / Javier Ferraez2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2024-07-14vs Team 4 Pirates Over 40Lost 01
L#1 DoublesMesbah Motamed / Sanjivan Sivapiragasam vs Jeff Buhl / Jose MacAranas4-6, 5-5
2024-07-08vs Team 5 Wise Ace GOATsWon 10
W#1 DoublesChristopher Corvo / Sanjivan Sivapiragasam vs Scott Gorvett / Sumeet Chawla6-4, 5-2
2024-06-21vs Team 4 Pirates Over 40Lost 02
L#1 DoublesJonathan Ferrell / Clay Kirkendall vs Mike Burgoyne / Jeff Rosenblum4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesTed Breinig / Anthony McGovern vs Mark Brown / Amir Moinfar2-6, 5-5
2024-06-17vs Team 1 WolvesWon 20
W#1 DoublesChristopher Corvo / Mesbah Motamed vs Ge Bai / M Zhu6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesRonald Oberbillig / Jonathan Ferrell vs Frank Wang / XIAOCHUN JI5-7, 4-0
2024-06-09vs Team 2 High VoltageLost 02
L#1 DoublesStephen Worrall / Jonathan Ferrell vs Senthil Kumar Seetharaman / Elango Rengasamy3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesClay Kirkendall / Ted Breinig vs Raj Indugula / VIjay Chari3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Adult 40 & Over 4.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.52 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Jacques Oliver
published 4
3.69
Christopher Corvo
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.56
Stephen Worrall
published
3.54
3.51
Sanjivan Sivapiragasam
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.44
Ted Breinig
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.40
Jonathan Ferrell
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
Clay Kirkendall
published 3.5
Mesbah Motamed
published
Ronald Oberbillig
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Jacques Beaudry-Losique
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
4
Jacques Oliver
2W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
4
Christopher Corvo
15W–19L career · 2 lines in 2024
7%92%1%
3.69
Stephen Worrall
9W–7L career · no lines in 2024
32%68%<1%
3.56
Muthukrishnan Ganesan
3W–6L career · no lines in 2024
38%62%<1%
3.54
4
Sanjivan Sivapiragasam
86W–88L career · 2 lines in 2024
47%53%<1%
3.51
3.5
Ted Breinig
33W–56L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%67%33%
3.44
4
Jonathan Ferrell
101W–197L career · 4 lines in 2024
79%21%<1%
3.40
3.5
Clay Kirkendall
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Mesbah Motamed
2W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Ronald Oberbillig
3W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.