Teams

BStover/RGogate (Blakeney)

2024 Singles 40 & Over League · 40 & Over Singles 3.5 Men - Mon PM

8 players · average NTRP 3.60 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-08-11vs MTwer (WSRC)Won 21
W#1 SinglesSumit Gahlawat vs Alberto Botero6-0, 6-2
W#2 SinglesGanesh Pallem vs Kevin Stein6-4, 6-0
L#3 SinglesPhillip Osborne vs Michael Twer6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2024-07-22vs KSwain (Col Beatty)Won 21
W#1 SinglesSumit Gahlawat vs Saurabh Tyagi7-5, 6-1
W#2 SinglesGanesh Pallem vs Rakesh Padhy1-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 SinglesRishi Gogate vs Krishna Swain6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2024-07-15vs BSledd (Jeff Adams)Won 10
W#1 SinglesPhillip Osborne vs Raul Zamudio6-1, 6-3
2024-07-08vs JDichak (WSRC)Lost 01
L#1 SinglesPhillip Osborne vs Rishi Kapur0-6, 2-6
2024-07-01vs VDatta (Raintree)Lost 01
L#2 SinglesPhillip Osborne vs Jarret Lewis1-6, 2-6
2024-06-24vs TParis (Life Time)Won 20
W#1 SinglesSumit Gahlawat vs Stephen Polacek6-2, 6-1
W#2 SinglesGanesh Pallem vs Kirk Tatge7-5, 6-2
2024-06-17vs KFranks (PPRSC)Lost 01
L#2 SinglesGanesh Pallem vs Kent Franks6-0, 3-6, 0-1
2024-06-03vs WDawson (Olde Providence)Lost 12
W#1 SinglesSumit Gahlawat vs Neeraj Khanna2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 SinglesGanesh Pallem vs Jose Bermudez7-6, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 SinglesRishi Gogate vs Andrew McWilliams6-7, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over Singles 3.5 Men - Mon PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.28 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.62
Sumit Gahlawat
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.47
Ganesh Pallem
usually #2 Singles 83%, also #3 Singles 17% · published 3.5
3.31
Rishi Gogate
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.25
Timothy Hodge
published
Billy Stover
published 3.5
3.24
Michel Abranches
published
3.09
Phillip Osborne
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.01
Will Irish
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ganesh Pallem + Sumit Gahlawat3251% gamesnot enough data
Ganesh Pallem + Phillip Osborne303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Sumit Gahlawat
62W–30L career · 4 lines in 2024
20%80%<1%
3.62
3.5
Ganesh Pallem
129W–71L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%59%41%
3.47
3.5
Rishi Gogate
47W–76L career · 2 lines in 2024
1%90%9%
3.31
Timothy Hodge
25W–20L career · no lines in 2024
3%93%4%
3.25
3.5
Billy Stover
1W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Michel Abranches
5W–4L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.24
3.5
Phillip Osborne
37W–47L career · 4 lines in 2024
26%74%<1%
3.09
Will Irish
3W–11L career · no lines in 2024
46%54%<1%
3.01

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.