Teams

Liberty Park Tennis-Bastian

2022 USTA Adult 18 & Over · 3.0W AM

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / UTAH

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule

Flight standings for 3.0W AM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.07 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.81
Jaime Vance
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.44
Emily Hales
usually #2 Doubles 46%, also #1 Doubles 36% · published 4
3.20
Jessica Whittaker
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published
3.19
Jennifer Tooley
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.90
Maria Pettit
usually #2 Singles 46%, also #1 Singles 27% · published 3
2.89
Rebecca Harman
usually #2 Doubles 52%, also #3 Doubles 19% · published
2.65
KayeLynn BASTIAN
usually #1 Doubles 31%, also #2 Singles 31% · published 3
2.48
Mary Jane Swalberg
usually #3 Doubles 58%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Linda Larsen
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published
Mary Jayne Child
usually #3 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
Molly Adams
usually #1 Doubles 36%, also #3 Doubles 36% · published
Sherrie Hatch
usually #2 Singles 47%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jennifer Tooley + Jaime Vance8259% games+11.0% vs expected
Jessica Whittaker + Jaime Vance16069% games+9.6% vs expected
Maria Pettit + Sherrie Hatch6357% games+7.4% vs expected
Rebecca Harman + Molly Adams7352% games+6.9% vs expected
KayeLynn BASTIAN + Jaime Vance20364% games+5.3% vs expected
Mary Jayne Child + Molly Adams13857% games+5.1% vs expected
KayeLynn BASTIAN + Maria Pettit5649% games+4.6% vs expected
Jennifer Tooley + Sherrie Hatch3650% games+2.4% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Jaime Vance
176W–62L career · 17 lines in 2022
1%92%8%
3.81
4
Emily Hales
90W–58L career · 11 lines in 2022
67%33%<1%
3.44
Jessica Whittaker
87W–79L career · 8 lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Jennifer Tooley
198W–228L career · 12 lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.19
3
Maria Pettit
188W–196L career · 10 lines in 2022
<1%78%22%
2.90
Rebecca Harman
241W–300L career · 21 lines in 2022
<1%80%19%
2.89
3
KayeLynn BASTIAN
209W–244L career · 15 lines in 2022
13%87%<1%
2.65
Mary Jane Swalberg
75W–203L career · 12 lines in 2022
56%44%<1%
2.48
Linda Larsen
18W–32L career · 7 lines in 2022
not enough data
Mary Jayne Child
50W–107L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data
Molly Adams
83W–53L career · 13 lines in 2022
not enough data
Sherrie Hatch
74W–76L career · 15 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.