Teams

OKC Spring/Laplante/Serve-ezas/2.5

2026 OKCAdult 18 & Over League · 2.5

9 players · average NTRP 2.50 / OKLAHOMA

View scouting list →
Schedule12 played
2026-06-25vs LOBstersWon 10
W#1 DoublesSarah Laplante / Rachel Litsch vs Marissa Smith / Samantha Ward6-0, 6-2
2026-06-18vs Varsity Team BeastWon 21
W#1 DoublesJaclyn Burroughs / Sarah Laplante vs Karina Lueck / Sharon Mejia6-4, 6-4
W#1 SinglesRachel Litsch vs Amy Dillon4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAshly Bates / Allison Gray vs Nguyet Burke / Taylor Clark7-5, 4-6, 0-1
2026-06-11vs Quail Yeah!Lost 12
L#1 DoublesRachel Litsch / Cydney Clark vs Cadee Coulter / Lori Bowman7-5, 0-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesSarah Laplante vs Lauren Garder6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesAshly Bates / Sara Wyckoff vs Nichole Fischer / Mckenna Schroder1-6, 3-6
2026-05-28vs Lady Beast/Team BeastWon 30
W#1 DoublesAshly Bates / Jaclyn Burroughs vs Chris Myers / Daniella Pasalo6-0, 6-0
W#1 SinglesCydney Clark vs Liliana Casas6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesSarah Laplante / Sara Wyckoff vs Andrea Baker / Noeen Sarfraz6-3, 6-1
2026-05-21vs Not Our FaultWon 30
W#1 DoublesSarah Laplante / Jayme Phillips vs Julie Ganter / Emily Shanbour6-1, 6-3
W#1 SinglesJaclyn Burroughs vs Stacey Steiner6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesAshly Bates / Sara Wyckoff vs Cindy Watts / Rachael Weber6-2, 6-2
2026-05-14vs Net NerdsWon 21
W#1 DoublesJaclyn Burroughs / Jayme Phillips vs Julie Ann Ward / Kimberly Eppes6-1, 6-0
W#1 SinglesAshly Bates vs Camila Carranza6-1, 6-0
L#2 DoublesCydney Clark / Julie Chamberlain vs Jennifer Hawkins / Jessica Holmboe3-6, 2-6
2026-05-07vs LOBstersWon 21
W#1 DoublesRachel Litsch / Jayme Phillips vs Mary FitzSimons / Kimberly Greenlee6-2, 6-1
L#1 SinglesCydney Clark vs Amy James1-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesAshly Bates / Sarah Laplante vs Lesley Smith / Courtney Wallace6-1, 6-0
2026-04-30vs Varsity Team BeastWon 21
W#1 DoublesJaclyn Burroughs / Cydney Clark vs Taylor Clark / Shabria Daniels6-1, 6-1
W#1 SinglesRachel Litsch vs Amy Dillon7-6, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAllison Gray / Sarah Laplante vs Nguyet Burke / Karina Lueck1-6, 1-6
2026-04-23vs Quail Yeah!Won 21
W#1 DoublesSarah Laplante / Rachel Litsch vs Lori Bowman / Shannon Medley6-2, 6-4
W#1 SinglesJaclyn Burroughs vs Kyle Hicks6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesAngela Fry / Sara Wyckoff vs Mckenna Schroder / Nichole Fischer5-7, 3-6
2026-04-09vs Lady Beast/Team BeastWon 30
W#1 DoublesCydney Clark / Ashly Bates vs Chris Myers / Annie Walker6-0, 6-2
W#1 SinglesSarah Laplante vs Noeen Sarfraz6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesAllison Gray / Jayme Phillips vs Andrea Baker / Laura Klier6-1, 6-3
2026-04-02vs Not Our FaultWon 20
W#1 DoublesJaclyn Burroughs / Ashly Bates vs Emily Shanbour / Cindy Watts6-4, 6-0
W#2 DoublesAngela Fry / Sara Wyckoff vs Kim Weeks / Stacey Steiner3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2026-03-26vs Net NerdsWon 30
W#1 DoublesSarah Laplante / Cydney Clark vs Jennifer Cox / Jennifer Hawkins4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#1 SinglesRachel Litsch vs Julie Ann Ward2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAngela Fry / Jayme Phillips vs Jessica Antle / Jessica Holmboe7-5, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · 2.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1OKC Spring/Laplante/Serve-ezas/2.511128821214
2Varsity Team Beast74231024238
3LOBsters46131736277
4Quail Yeah!46121841305
5Lady Beast/Team Beast11153163407

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.28 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.56
Ashly Bates
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 2.5
2.52
Jaclyn Burroughs
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #1 Singles 29% · published
2.31
Sarah Laplante
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published
2.29
Allison Gray
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.25
Cydney Clark
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #1 Singles 29% · published 2.5
2.24
Rachel Litsch
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #1 Singles 43% · published
2.19
Sara Wyckoff
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.12
Julie Chamberlain
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.08
Angela Fry
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cydney Clark + Jaclyn Burroughs213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

2.5
Ashly Bates
6W–2L career · type S · 8 lines in 2026
0%34%66%
2.56
Jaclyn Burroughs
10W–3L career · 7 lines in 2026
0%45%55%
2.52
Sarah Laplante
13W–12L career · 10 lines in 2026
0%91%9%
2.31
2.5
Allison Gray
2W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%93%7%
2.29
2.5
Cydney Clark
10W–20L career · 7 lines in 2026
0%96%4%
2.25
Rachel Litsch
6W–4L career · 7 lines in 2026
0%97%3%
2.24
Sara Wyckoff
3W–2L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.19
Julie Chamberlain
1W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.12
2.5
Angela Fry
5W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.08

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.