Teams

Not Our Fault

2026 OKCAdult 18 & Over League · 2.5

7 players · average NTRP 2.50 / OKLAHOMA

View scouting list →
Schedule12 played
2026-06-26vs LOBstersSplit 11
W#1 DoublesEmily Shanbour / Julie Ganter vs Kimberly Stout / Marissa Smith6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesStacey Steiner / Kim Weeks vs Courtney Wallace / Amy James3-6, 3-6
2026-06-18vs Net NerdsLost 12
L#1 DoublesKim Weeks / Cindy Watts vs Jennifer Cox / Julie Ann Ward2-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesHeidi Mcreynolds vs Camila Carranza6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesStacey Steiner / Emily Shanbour vs Jessica Holmboe / Jessica Antle7-6, 6-7, 0-1
2026-06-04vs Varsity Team BeastLost 12
W#1 DoublesHeidi Mcreynolds / Cindy Watts vs Kathleen Guedry / Shabria Daniels7-5, 6-3
L#1 SinglesDevin Sabolich vs Amy Dillon1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesEmily Shanbour / Julie Ganter vs Karina Lueck / Sharon Mejia3-6, 6-0, 0-1
2026-06-01vs Quail Yeah!Lost 02
L#1 DoublesJulie Ganter / Cindy Watts vs Nichole Fischer / Mckenna Schroder3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#1 SinglesStacey Steiner vs Lauren Garder6-4, 5-7, 0-1
2026-05-21vs OKC Spring/Laplante/Serve-ezas/2.5Lost 03
L#1 DoublesJulie Ganter / Emily Shanbour vs Sarah Laplante / Jayme Phillips1-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesStacey Steiner vs Jaclyn Burroughs1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesCindy Watts / Rachael Weber vs Ashly Bates / Sara Wyckoff2-6, 2-6
2026-05-14vs Lady Beast/Team BeastWon 21
W#1 DoublesCindy Watts / Rachael Weber vs Chris Myers / Daniella Pasalo6-0, 6-1
W#1 SinglesSheila Rolen-Pender vs Laura Klier6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKim Weeks / Heidi Mcreynolds vs Yannette Casas / Annie Walker5-7, 6-7
2026-04-30vs Net NerdsLost 03
L#1 DoublesSheila Rolen-Pender / Emily Shanbour vs Brittany Deitch / Suzette Grillot3-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesDevin Sabolich vs Julie Ann Ward3-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesJulie Ganter / Heidi Mcreynolds vs Jessica Holmboe / Jennifer Hawkins3-6, 2-6
2026-04-23vs LOBstersLost 01
L#2 DoublesRachael Weber / Stacey Steiner vs Courtney Wallace / Moira Parham1-6, 4-6
2026-04-16vs Varsity Team BeastWon 21
W#1 DoublesEmily Shanbour / Julie Ganter vs Nguyet Burke / Taylor Clark7-5, 4-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesDevin Sabolich vs Amy Dillon5-7, 4-6
W#2 DoublesCindy Watts / Sheila Rolen-Pender vs Kathleen Guedry / Amanda Jimeson7-5, 6-4
2026-04-09vs Quail Yeah!Won 30
W#1 DoublesEmily Shanbour / Julie Ganter vs Nichole Fischer / Shannon Medley6-1, 6-1
W#1 SinglesSheila Rolen-Pender vs Lauren Cooper6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesRachael Weber / Heidi Mcreynolds vs Carly Farris / Deana Skalovsky6-1, 6-1
2026-04-02vs OKC Spring/Laplante/Serve-ezas/2.5Lost 12
L#1 DoublesEmily Shanbour / Cindy Watts vs Jaclyn Burroughs / Ashly Bates4-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesDevin Sabolich vs Jayme Phillips7-6, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKim Weeks / Stacey Steiner vs Angela Fry / Sara Wyckoff6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2026-03-26vs Lady Beast/Team BeastWon 30
W#1 DoublesJulie Ganter / Rachael Weber vs Liliana Casas / Laura Klier7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesDevin Sabolich vs Noeen Sarfraz6-0, 7-6
W#2 DoublesSheila Rolen-Pender / Heidi Mcreynolds vs Andrea Baker / Chris Myers7-6, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.23 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.40
Devin Sabolich
usually #1 Singles 46%, also #2 Singles 36% · published 2.5
2.35
Heidi Mcreynolds
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 17% · published
2.31
Julie Ganter
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.31
Emily Shanbour
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.22
Sheila Rolen-Pender
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published
2.21
Cindy Watts
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 2.5
1.84
Stacey Steiner
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sheila Rolen-Pender + Cindy Watts3255% games+10.6% vs expected
Emily Shanbour + Julie Ganter71046% games−1.1% vs expected
Emily Shanbour + Cindy Watts3247% games−5.8% vs expected
Julie Ganter + Cindy Watts033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

2.5
Devin Sabolich
8W–21L career · 11 lines in 2026
0%76%24%
2.40
Heidi Mcreynolds
4W–2L career · 6 lines in 2026
0%86%14%
2.35
Julie Ganter
20W–45L career · 8 lines in 2026
0%91%9%
2.31
Emily Shanbour
35W–52L career · 8 lines in 2026
0%92%8%
2.31
Sheila Rolen-Pender
11W–28L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%98%2%
2.22
2.5
Cindy Watts
11W–10L career · 7 lines in 2026
0%98%2%
2.21
Stacey Steiner
0W–10L career · 6 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.84

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.