Teams

OC Heritage Park Irvine - Nisha/Genesis Sun11

2023 USTA Adult 18 & Over - OC · OC Women WE - 4.0

11 players · average NTRP 3.88 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-07-02vs OC CMTC - DeeLost 01
L#3 DoublesKaeko Jenni / Miyu Davis vs Kelly Davis / Arison Hong2-6, 2-6
L#1 DoublesKristen Petrovacki / Miyu Davis vs Lauren Nicole Finke / PATRICIA ARAKI2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesKaeko Jenni / Noriko Imai vs Angelica Ramos / Viviana Kim2-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesKristen Petrovacki vs Rachel Om5-7, 7-5, 1-0
2023-05-07vs OC Acing Gracefully CMTC - TriciaWon 10
W#1 SinglesKristen Petrovacki vs Yolanda Barocio6-2, 6-2
2023-04-23vs OC RCI - SashaLost 01
L#1 SinglesKristen Petrovacki vs Natalie Cernius6-3, 6-7, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for OC Women WE - 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.57 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.94
Kristen Petrovacki
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.84
Susie Park
published
3.72
Rachel Brereton
published
3.68
Genesis Arreola
published 4
3.67
Jane Tran
published
3.57
Patricia Santiago
published
3.53
Azin Mirchi
published 4
3.47
Nisha Anish
published
3.29
Kaeko Jenni
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.03
Noriko Imai
published
Zheng Hua
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Kristen Petrovacki
134W–41L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%68%32%
3.94
Susie Park
14W–8L career · no lines in 2023
<1%89%11%
3.84
Rachel Brereton
9W–2L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.72
4
Genesis Arreola
13W–11L career · no lines in 2023
8%91%1%
3.68
Jane Tran
4W–9L career · no lines in 2023
9%90%1%
3.67
Patricia Santiago
4W–17L career · no lines in 2023
30%70%<1%
3.57
4
Azin Mirchi
6W–9L career · no lines in 2023
41%59%<1%
3.53
Nisha Anish
27W–16L career · no lines in 2023
<1%59%41%
3.47
3.5
Kaeko Jenni
94W–89L career · 5 lines in 2023
1%94%5%
3.29
Noriko Imai
5W–10L career · no lines in 2023
42%58%<1%
3.03
Zheng Hua
3W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.