Teams

OC RCI - Sasha

2023 USTA Adult 18 & Over - OC · OC Women WE - 4.0

14 players · average NTRP 4.25 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
W#1 DoublesElyzabeth Pham / Theresa Jeong vs Sara Baird / Helen Lam6-3, 6-4
L#1 SinglesVandana Kadiamada vs Demi Dang1-6, 1-6
W#1 DoublesNina Berry / Devon Hogue vs Jennifer Budzak / Sabrina Wedge6-0, 6-0
2023-06-25vs OC CMTC - DeeWon 20
W#2 DoublesNina Berry / Lori McFerren vs Jody Brennan / Indrani Jackson6-2, 6-2
W#2 SinglesVandana Kadiamada vs Lea Tamblyn7-5, 6-2
2023-06-17vs OC Acing Gracefully CMTC - TriciaWon 30
W#2 DoublesNina Berry / Devon Hogue vs Liz Kirksey / Romi Archer6-4, 6-0
W#2 SinglesVandana Kadiamada vs Yolanda Barocio6-0, 6-3
W#3 DoublesTheresa Jeong / Lori McFerren vs Karin Adams / Cathy Jackson6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesTheresa Jeong / Lori McFerren vs Julie Napoli / Karen Obst6-0, 6-3
W#2 SinglesVandana Kadiamada vs Gladys Tan6-4, 7-5
2023-05-20vs OC - Chapman - Mary 9amSplit 11
L#1 DoublesNina Berry / Lori McFerren vs Vera Garrard / Judy Lee Vogt1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesNikki Liu - (DQ)* / Theresa Jeong vs Cheryl Smith / Susie Hunnel6-4, 7-6
L#1 DoublesVandana Kadiamada / Ida Shu vs Lisa Nguyen / Jazmin Rubio0-6, 0-6
W#1 DoublesNina Berry / Vandana Kadiamada vs Amy Finstein / Patricia Santiago6-2, 7-5
W#3 DoublesElyzabeth Pham / Theresa Jeong vs Nisha Anish / Jane Tran6-1, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for OC Women WE - 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.83 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.17
Nina Berry
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
4.11
Devon Hogue
published 4
4.04
Vandana Kadiamada
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.03
Theresa Jeong
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
3.91
Elyzabeth Pham
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.87
Lori McFerren
published
3.86
Luna Qingyue Cai
published
3.79
Huyen Tran
published
3.77
Lily Pham
published
3.70
Ida Shu
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.63
Michelle Sinclair
published
3.50
Kelly Dishno
published
3.38
Mai Gu
published
Natalie Cernius
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mai Gu + Michelle Sinclair3551% games+10.2% vs expected
Devon Hogue + Nina Berry9460% gamesnot enough data
Theresa Jeong + Elyzabeth Pham404 matchesnot enough data
Lori McFerren + Nina Berry213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Nina Berry
112W–62L career · 5 lines in 2023
11%88%1%
4.17
4
Devon Hogue
73W–48L career · no lines in 2023
<1%22%78%
4.11
4.5
Vandana Kadiamada
49W–22L career · 6 lines in 2023
40%60%<1%
4.04
4.5
Theresa Jeong
83W–33L career · 5 lines in 2023
41%59%<1%
4.03
4
Elyzabeth Pham
152W–37L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%74%26%
3.91
Lori McFerren
24W–11L career · no lines in 2023
<1%81%18%
3.87
Luna Qingyue Cai
10W–19L career · no lines in 2023
<1%83%16%
3.86
Huyen Tran
13W–10L career · no lines in 2023
<1%2%98%
3.79
Lily Pham
18W–10L career · no lines in 2023
<1%3%97%
3.77
4
Ida Shu
61W–66L career · 1 line in 2023
7%91%2%
3.70
Michelle Sinclair
13W–14L career · no lines in 2023
<1%<1%>99%
3.63
Kelly Dishno
8W–3L career · no lines in 2023
<1%49%51%
3.50
Mai Gu
13W–16L career · no lines in 2023
<1%<1%>99%
3.38
Natalie Cernius
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.