Teams

SSLT GREEN

2021 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER

10 players · average NTRP 3.12 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2021-07-25vs LTFC BLUELost 13
L#1 DoublesMelinda Grandy / Stacie Emarine vs Heidi David / Amy Handlin2-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesSherri Rosselot vs Karen Giles6-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJanet Swanson / Susie Taylor vs Vickie Conroy / Lynn Price5-7, 6-2, 0-1
W#3 DoublesRoberta Seifert / Pamela Probst vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2021-07-15vs PRC BLUEWon 31
W#1 DoublesTari Gold / Pamela Probst vs Emily Carter / Stephanie Stavri6-1, 7-6
W#1 SinglesKaren Ramon vs Kim Addlesperger6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesStacie Emarine / Janet Swanson vs Kristen Crookshanks / Billie Aguilar3-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesRoberta Seifert / Ellen Shoemaker vs Janice Nelson / Toni Payne6-7, 6-3, 1-0
2021-07-14vs HW REDLost 13
L#1 DoublesRoberta Seifert / Ellen Shoemaker vs Camille Wright / Stephanie Luther5-7, 3-6
L#1 SinglesStacie Emarine vs Jennifer Johnson0-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesSusie Taylor / Janet Swanson vs Jennifer Marlowe / Leslie Cutter6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesKaren Ramon / Sherri Rosselot vs Corby McGrath / Tracy Edwards3-6, 4-6
2021-07-08vs HFII REDSplit 22
W#1 DoublesJanet Swanson / Susie Taylor vs Mary Roth / Jennifer Frontz6-2, 6-1
W#1 SinglesKaren Ramon vs Kim MacKendrick6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesSherri Rosselot / Pamela Probst vs Bonnie Mccoumb / Linda Staples3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesMelinda Grandy / Tari Gold vs Emily Zadvorny / Heather Dewey1-6, 1-6
2021-06-24vs HRCA BLACKSplit 22
W#1 DoublesRoberta Seifert / Ellen Shoemaker vs Kathleen Parisi / Dana Anderson6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesTari Gold vs Amy Tharp5-7, 4-6
W#2 DoublesSusie Taylor / Janet Swanson vs Adele Rhinehart / Melinda Shaffer6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMelinda Grandy / Stacie Emarine vs Marika Fodor / Shannon Porter0-6, 4-6
2021-06-17vs HV GREENSplit 22
L#1 DoublesPamela Probst / Sherri Rosselot vs Angela Martorella / Ashley Festoso4-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesEllen Shoemaker vs Stephanie Wilcox6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesRoberta Seifert / Janet Swanson vs Kathy Shepherd / Amy Dawson6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesMelinda Grandy / Tari Gold vs Heather Mantel / Holly Gant3-6, 3-6
2021-06-10vs SSH REDSplit 22
W#1 DoublesSusie Taylor / Janet Swanson vs Cheryl Sanders / Monica Greenfield6-2, 6-2
L#1 SinglesTari Gold vs Amy Mohr3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesRoberta Seifert / Ellen Shoemaker vs Lindsay Fisher / Lisa DeBastos7-6, 6-4
L#3 DoublesSherri Rosselot / Pamela Probst vs Cheryl Perez / Debbie Maloney4-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.84 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.22
Janet Swanson
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
2.99
Karen Ramon
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.96
Susie Taylor
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
2.91
Ellen Shoemaker
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 3
2.71
Sherri Rosselot
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
2.70
Roberta Seifert
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.42
Stacie Emarine
usually #3 Doubles 25%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3
Melinda Grandy
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Pamela Probst
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Tari Gold
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Pamela Probst + Sherri Rosselot1441% games+2.7% vs expected
Janet Swanson + Sherri Rosselot3548% games+2.0% vs expected
Roberta Seifert + Ellen Shoemaker173943% games−2.0% vs expected
Susie Taylor + Janet Swanson224043% games−4.4% vs expected
Tari Gold + Sherri Rosselot2443% games−6.3% vs expected
Janet Swanson + Roberta Seifert2446% gamesnot enough data
Susie Taylor + Sherri Rosselot044 matchesnot enough data
Janet Swanson + Ellen Shoemaker134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Janet Swanson
59W–94L career · 7 lines in 2021
5%94%1%
3.22
3.5
Karen Ramon
42W–68L career · 3 lines in 2021
54%46%<1%
2.99
Susie Taylor
25W–50L career · 5 lines in 2021
<1%64%36%
2.96
3
Ellen Shoemaker
26W–61L career · 5 lines in 2021
<1%75%24%
2.91
Sherri Rosselot
13W–51L career · 5 lines in 2021
5%93%1%
2.71
3
Roberta Seifert
47W–101L career · 6 lines in 2021
6%93%1%
2.70
3
Stacie Emarine
12W–55L career · 4 lines in 2021
74%26%<1%
2.42
Melinda Grandy
29W–46L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
Pamela Probst
6W–11L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
Tari Gold
24W–34L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.