Teams

HRCA BLACK

2021 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-07-15vs SSH REDLost 13
L#1 DoublesKathleen Parisi / Dana Anderson vs Cheryl Sanders / Monica Greenfield2-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesMarika Fodor vs Debbie Maloney3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesColleen Krebsbach / Deborah Miller vs Chris Thulin / Lindsay Fisher4-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesNantida Hong / Amy Tharp vs Cheryl Perez / Jill Nelson6-3, 7-6
2021-07-08vs LTFC BLUELost 13
L#1 DoublesDeborah Miller / Melinda Shaffer vs Lisa Zook / Vickie Conroy0-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesNantida Hong vs Karen Giles6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesCinda Nab / Amy Tharp vs Heidi David / Amy Handlin1-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMarika Fodor / Shannon Porter vs VANESSA TURNBULL / Cindy Arnell1-6, 7-6, 0-1
2021-07-01vs PRC BLUESplit 22
L#1 DoublesColleen Krebsbach / Deborah Miller vs Kristen Crookshanks / Emily Carter4-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesAdele Rhinehart vs Lisa Franklin3-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesAmy Tharp / Nantida Hong vs Patti Cottrell / Stephanie Stavri6-3, 7-6
W#3 DoublesCinda Nab / Marika Fodor vs Toni Payne / Janice Nelson7-6, 6-2
2021-06-24vs SSLT GREENSplit 22
L#1 DoublesKathleen Parisi / Dana Anderson vs Roberta Seifert / Ellen Shoemaker4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#1 SinglesAmy Tharp vs Tari Gold7-5, 6-4
L#2 DoublesAdele Rhinehart / Melinda Shaffer vs Susie Taylor / Janet Swanson6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMarika Fodor / Shannon Porter vs Melinda Grandy / Stacie Emarine6-0, 6-4
2021-06-17vs HW REDWon 31
W#1 DoublesMelinda Shaffer / Adele Rhinehart vs Jennifer Marlowe / Leslie Cutter2-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#1 SinglesNantida Hong vs Camille Wright3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKathleen Parisi / Dana Anderson vs Randy Eidler / Jennifer Johnson3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesColleen Krebsbach / Deborah Miller vs Mary Morris / Corby McGrath4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2021-06-11vs HFII REDSplit 22
W#1 DoublesColleen Krebsbach / Deborah Miller vs Melissa Wern / Lauren Landen7-5, 2-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesNantida Hong vs Emily Zadvorny6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCinda Nab / Amy Tharp vs Mary Roth / Jennifer Frontz3-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesDana Anderson / Melinda Shaffer vs Kim MacKendrick / Elizabeth Restivo2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.13 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.51
Nantida Hong
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.35
Shannon Porter
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.24
Melinda Shaffer
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.21
Adele Rhinehart
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.13
Dana Anderson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.04
Colleen Krebsbach
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.99
Amy Tharp
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
2.88
Cinda Nab
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.84
Marika Fodor
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3.5
Kathleen Parisi
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Adele Rhinehart + Melinda Shaffer151450% games+3.6% vs expected
Dana Anderson + Kathleen Parisi2743% games+2.3% vs expected
Cinda Nab + Shannon Porter2551% games−0.1% vs expected
Dana Anderson + Melinda Shaffer3843% games−3.2% vs expected
Dana Anderson + Adele Rhinehart61349% games−3.3% vs expected
Marika Fodor + Shannon Porter4548% games−3.5% vs expected
Amy Tharp + Cinda Nab01035% games−11.8% vs expected
Colleen Krebsbach + Adele Rhinehart4256% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Nantida Hong
124W–79L career · 5 lines in 2021
47%53%<1%
3.51
Shannon Porter
47W–61L career · 2 lines in 2021
<1%88%12%
3.35
Melinda Shaffer
46W–71L career · 4 lines in 2021
3%94%2%
3.24
3.5
Adele Rhinehart
96W–104L career · 3 lines in 2021
5%93%1%
3.21
3.5
Dana Anderson
40W–85L career · 4 lines in 2021
15%85%<1%
3.13
3.5
Colleen Krebsbach
63W–75L career · 4 lines in 2021
39%61%<1%
3.04
3.5
Amy Tharp
24W–62L career · 5 lines in 2021
54%46%<1%
2.99
3
Cinda Nab
52W–74L career · 3 lines in 2021
<1%81%19%
2.88
3.5
Marika Fodor
21W–33L career · 4 lines in 2021
90%10%<1%
2.84
Kathleen Parisi
7W–27L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.