Teams

Dobbins - PCRC

2025 OWB Adult 18 & Over · 3.5 Adult 18 & Over - Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.40 / REGION_1

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-07-13vs Hibbard - Camp CreekLost 12
W#1 DoublesAmber Stubblefield / Michelle Oneill vs Donna Capozzoli / Christine Davidson1-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#1 SinglesGarrett Bonham vs Sherri Miller6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSuracha Mahawongsanun / Kathy Weitekamp vs Gloria Schulz / Tiffany Harran4-6, 2-6
2025-05-18vs Morgan - Camp CreekWon 32
W#1 DoublesDanielle Bense / Ellen Fitzgibbon vs MISSY HANNAHAN / Julie Martin6-4, 6-4
W#1 SinglesAmber Stubblefield vs Sophie Cohen6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKathyrn Beiswanger / Austin McNeil vs Catherine Morgan / Sterling Edison4-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesMichelle Oneill vs Jamie Lynn2-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesKathy Weitekamp / Garrett Bonham vs Carol Southerland / Diana Kish6-2, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Adult 18 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.06 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.29
Victoria Bailey
published
Amber Stubblefield
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Danielle Bense
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Ellen Fitzgibbon
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Garrett Bonham
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3.5
2.83
Kathyrn Beiswanger
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published
Austin McNeil
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
Kathy Weitekamp
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Laurel Beach
published
Michelle Oneill
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Suracha Mahawongsanun
usually #3 Doubles 38%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Austin McNeil + Garrett Bonham314 matchesnot enough data
Kathyrn Beiswanger + Ellen Fitzgibbon303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Victoria Bailey
1W–7L career · no lines in 2025
95%5%<1%
3.29
3.5
Amber Stubblefield
5W–0L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Danielle Bense
1W–0L career · type S · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Ellen Fitzgibbon
4W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Garrett Bonham
5W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kathyrn Beiswanger
13W–21L career · 8 lines in 2025
<1%89%10%
2.83
3
Austin McNeil
6W–7L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kathy Weitekamp
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Laurel Beach
2W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Michelle Oneill
16W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Suracha Mahawongsanun
9W–7L career · 8 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.