Teams

Morgan - Camp Creek

2025 OWB Adult 18 & Over · 3.5 Adult 18 & Over - Women

19 players · average NTRP 3.38 / REGION_1

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-07-13vs Shrewsbury - TopslSplit 22
W#1 DoublesBeth Kimche / Debbie Watson vs Cindy White / Virginia Ballard6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesJamie Lynn vs Jamie Shrewsbury6-1, 6-4
L#2 DoublesAllison Page / Karin Egan vs Lydia Casey / Lisa Harris3-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesDiana Kish / Cindy Krutz vs Anne Johnson / Rita Myler2-6, 7-6, 0-1
2025-06-22vs Hibbard - Camp CreekWon 31
W#1 DoublesJulie Martin / Cindy Krutz vs Deanna Hibbard / Tiffany Harran6-1, 6-3
W#1 SinglesJamie Lynn vs Peggy Ditmore6-2, 6-0
L#2 DoublesJennifer Geoghagan / Sterling Edison vs Marci Knauss / Beth Molteni6-7, 6-2, 0-1
W#3 DoublesCatherine Morgan / Melissa Skowlund vs Leslie Huff / Donna Capozzoli6-2, 6-2
2025-05-18vs Dobbins - PCRCSplit 22
L#1 DoublesMISSY HANNAHAN / Julie Martin vs Danielle Bense / Ellen Fitzgibbon4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesCatherine Morgan / Sterling Edison vs Kathyrn Beiswanger / Austin McNeil6-4, 6-4
W#2 SinglesJamie Lynn vs Michelle Oneill6-2, 6-0
L#3 DoublesCarol Southerland / Diana Kish vs Kathy Weitekamp / Garrett Bonham2-6, 4-6
2025-05-04vs OWB/Gibson/18&Over3.5WSplit 22
W#1 DoublesMISSY HANNAHAN / Julie Martin vs Memori Spence / Tania Muraro2-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDebbie Watson / Sterling Edison vs Lindy Wood / Ashley Goyne5-7, 0-6
W#2 SinglesJamie Lynn vs Bailey Quirk6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesCatherine Morgan / Carol Southerland vs Angie Gibson / Kim Baynes7-5, 4-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Adult 18 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.20 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.45
MISSY HANNAHAN
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.37
Debbie Watson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.37
Jamie Lynn
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
3.32
Sterling Edison
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.28
Cindy Krutz
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Diana Kish
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.24
Catherine Morgan
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.16
Jennifer Geoghagan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.16
Melissa Hannahan
published
3.13
Beth Kimche
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.08
Karin Egan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.08
Carol Southerland
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
3.05
Brittany Tarver
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.91
Nicole Rogers
published
Melissa Skowlund
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Meredith Sullivan
published
Sophie Cohen
published
Suzanne Harman
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Carol Southerland + Nicole Rogers224 matchesnot enough data
Karin Egan + Catherine Morgan134 matchesnot enough data
Carol Southerland + Brittany Tarver303 matchesnot enough data
Debbie Watson + MISSY HANNAHAN303 matchesnot enough data
MISSY HANNAHAN + Catherine Morgan123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

MISSY HANNAHAN
12W–16L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%64%36%
3.45
3.5
Debbie Watson
9W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%82%17%
3.37
Jamie Lynn
13W–7L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%82%17%
3.37
Sterling Edison
30W–20L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.32
3.5
Christina Sheringham
13W–7L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%5%
3.28
3.5
Cindy Krutz
3W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Diana Kish
2W–5L career · type A · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Catherine Morgan
9W–14L career · 3 lines in 2025
4%92%3%
3.24
Jennifer Geoghagan
2W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
13%87%1%
3.16
Melissa Hannahan
35W–11L career · no lines in 2025
<1%13%87%
3.16
3.5
Beth Kimche
2W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
17%83%<1%
3.13
Karin Egan
1W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
28%72%<1%
3.08
3
Carol Southerland
19W–8L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%29%71%
3.08
3
Brittany Tarver
31W–12L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%36%64%
3.05
Nicole Rogers
4W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%74%26%
2.91
Melissa Skowlund
3W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Meredith Sullivan
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Sophie Cohen
2W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Suzanne Harman
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.